From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira Subject: Re: Adopt a patch! Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:16:40 -0300 Message-ID: <87d16k2fiv.fsf@hyperbola.info> References: <877ex5d555.fsf@gnu.org> <4fecd5dd.AEQAQDR72NkAAAAAAAAAAAOzWv8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZudnG@mailjet.com> <87d16pf5x5.fsf@gnu.org> <0cd911c2-f64a-c60b-ef70-749c135a58e9@crazy-compilers.com> <87h8vw2lfz.fsf@elephly.net> <87d16k86aj.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dv49i-0001Dr-4d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:16:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dv49d-0008R9-Tb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:16:50 -0400 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:43719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dv49d-0008Qj-N3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:16:45 -0400 Received: from adfeno-pc1 (unknown [181.221.159.80]) (Authenticated sender: adfeno@hyperbola.info) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4F3541C090 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:16:42 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87d16k86aj.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:39:32 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org I agree. :) I rarely contribute to these places where there is such web interfaces. I like GNU Savannah (and Savane, the software) because it notifies through email like a mailing list would do, but I don't know if one can reply directly to the emails. Debbugs seems supperior because it allows replying directly and also keeps the bug/item history constant (not by date like usual mailing lists do). Maxim Cournoyer writes: > > +1. I don think the glossy interfaces of Github & co. add much to the > table in terms of automation. If you want to test the software, you > still have to checkout a local copy of it anyway (i.e., leave the > browser). > > Maxim > >