From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add systemd. Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 23:36:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0zhffz1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180401122259.9688-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87lge7f5ws.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9j2y9kd.fsf@gmail.com> <87sh8ebs06.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3783-0001EE-3H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 17:36:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3782-0007rn-4w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 17:36:39 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:60790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3781-0007mi-U6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 17:36:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sh8ebs06.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Sun, 01 Apr 2018 22:18:01 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Marius Bakke skribis: > Chris Marusich writes: > >> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> >>> To be honest, while the Shepherd has been a fun hack, I=E2=80=99ve been= more and >>> more feeling that yeah, it wouldn=E2=80=99t cut it in the long term (it= =E2=80=99s also >>> become clearer Scheme as convenient as C when it comes to systems >>> programming and things like dealing with dependency graphs.) >> >> I think you may have forgotten some words. When you said "it=E2=80=99s = also >> become clearer Scheme as convenient as C when it comes to systems >> programming and things like dealing with dependency graphs", what did >> you mean? > > I think Ludovic meant to convey "Scheme is NOT as convenient as C when > it comes to ...", but made something of a "Kinsley Gaffe" since the > opposite is obviously true. Heheh. :-) I was so excited by the announcement that my message was full of typos. Ludo=E2=80=99.