From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 13:03:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87d0ribeg2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <87k1m7y3md.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20181024135512.GA3804@jasmine.lan>
	<87d0rzxx15.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20181024141435.GA5988@jasmine.lan>
	<87efbyberv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38623)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1gK05M-0001lq-6d
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:03:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1gK05G-0006Ek-Fk
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:03:56 -0500
Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:37561)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1gK05F-000671-1q
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:03:50 -0500
In-reply-to: <87efbyberv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Also, if we move to go 1.11, should we remove go 1.9?  Considering there is=
 the
slowdown mentioned in https://bugs.gnu.org/32919, maybe it would be smarter=
 to
keep 1.9 around?

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlvhgx0ACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH84/QgAlH65H245PJB/O1NY/rXN6sd1ym+EvDClYJqwX7dxnpDQ2f53HVTB+5V9
lTPL/rGDUF5ILquhF0CO82DQypdsLPu62NQe4xPpjFueLDrFHunhST79ZsEEuL76
TH1+8PY4lCckhZTueIG1TQb0/9rYY2KEg9z6xJy4u2HztyaPoYN3kLKJ2uoa/y5h
dnM3oak+9ebIAhOCDyn+ES7roDclLk0wrnGZ9bQE37iO9YtLx5SUR2bJGo8QNy4R
YW2h0vh/c/Q5E099fifsJcP1vaZZUVdweXOnAblkDjxCAyJd/GMMqlINqbmzSNr2
b+t4QmOilvFl0r4JXOYmPIc2J7XuMA==
=jyy9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--