From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: End of beta soon? drop i686? Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:15:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0q75w3y.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20181211091944.dneczhtrave5jnjy@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWu3d-0003kF-E7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:15:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWu3Z-0003PW-EL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:15:29 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o53.zoho.com ([135.84.80.218]:21813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWu3Z-0003Or-2B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:15:25 -0500 In-reply-to: <20181211091944.dneczhtrave5jnjy@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0@n0.is Cc: guix-devel ng0@n0.is writes: > Let's not drop an architecture because occasionally something breaks for > it. breakage is bad, yes. but it's more than just the broken packages. > it is the way patches find their way into master. if you have more > patience then I had, you can try to address the workflow in guix (there > will be some past discussions you can find on the mailinglists). > > I've been on the high-friction lane with GuixSD, so I am talking from > experience and not just assumptions. I don=E2=80=99t understand what you are alluding to. Could you please elaborate? Could you translate this into concrete suggestions or expectations?=20 -- Ricardo