From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Should we upgrade openssl? Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:28:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0lkbyua.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wojvmk9n.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87r2a1d7s3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGjfl-0006Ji-3V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:28:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:09:22 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: Guix-devel Hi G=C3=A1bor, G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: > I would go for the upgrade. As this is a change affecting lots of package= s, > and this upgrade would allow us to reduce the chances to stuck with a > vulnerable version. I also suppose, that there areg- some changes on > core-updates we would like to merge anyways before 1.0, so if the upgrade > goes smoothly, then this is not a big loss of time. Wdyt? Merging =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 is no longer an option for 1.0: I=E2= =80=99m seriously still aiming for around April 30th. Let=E2=80=99s get our act together! Likewise, I don=E2=80=99t think the OpenSSL upgrade can be merged on time. = But that=E2=80=99s OK: we can start working on it and have it merged as soon as possible, possibly with all of =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. Thoughts? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.