From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: [Non-root Guix]: Unable to build guix Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 23:14:15 -0700 Message-ID: <87d0ky691k.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ftpwwq9l.fsf@elephly.net> <87a7g4wmvf.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMnwE-0001VI-CD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 02:14:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMnwD-0000Vr-M0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 02:14:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]:34102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMnwD-0000Vn-Dh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 02:14:21 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id c13so3792518pgt.1 for ; Fri, 03 May 2019 23:14:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87a7g4wmvf.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 02 May 2019 23:46:28 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus writes: > When using a different store > location it is impossible to use pre-built binaries, unfortunately. Nitpick: it is possible to use pre-built binaries when using a custom store location, if the substitutes were built for the same store location. But since the build farm only builds for the "/gnu/store" location, then yes, in practice anyone who uses a different store location will not be able to get substitutes from the build farm. I know Ricardo already knows this; I just wanted to clarify this in case anyone else was reading and might have gotten the wrong impression. =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlzNLbcACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp0I1hAAgS/4FmQIl0HdN3RvaZTyyt0/yK3dQpScwsDam+/jw4yeHqUyuVp23fsx b22szqk8La1IE5T6wnsJxm65YsMoX0L83TPYn3buNGmJIu61J4H1GdWMgyQDfhQi Mh1XcFVJjc4AAUonbZrdeeBkBbdMTFZvgfi1CqbVHufALy3vHL9m0RmZkKpvcutd OWoQ7zU5UnQ/qv3LiY9DkKAfgCyMS8bp2EdMaPAAWYxyl5eHY+PEWcWwu2eDYbBG i512yvl5eHzzVL+68hp1omiSlT83bqaxGV5ZP3BUEeF91TA1ByVZOqRjQcyaagDT E0A6GOjioaPY5vPLH4E85RqJZRybcMeccfzlsYMNV7mdPAfqdpWNQRtNcZV9N9Yi 4sI7n5MNjnrhZJiwU+2t6a1JOTVK3uKtTG2L8tpIWV6BkwMlcb25zVBtCii640W3 p3VUc8CufgfS8wTjPA1X6SKAVJRHIme3hCnx9VNIAQVvBVdPGJOIKzkmVNTgMMN0 DLqdbhT1oPaLwLmSy1kD9QXBCbIOg8lHQX9q2fzLLRwEpCFW7LcwzKDtCv/7+t4l llcOtlcSzxo+M5YvDJ4bsMx/YYx46bq79k+RPAlVKK8wjIwsSzHd5EKPSs2D96lM XiOs097ORtAb+rIqpyvFr8XfTIFRBS3uUzJwYIgnDaxNrPbY7jQ= =LwZ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--