From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: 01/01: services: Add SRFI-26 to Nix activation gexp. Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 19:54:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0jielkr.fsf@nckx> References: <20190611191005.14930.97243@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190611191006.B2385204DB@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87wohq6766.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb7S5-0001GK-Jj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:54:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hb7S3-00040z-GH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:54:25 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:7405::1]:58798) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hb7S1-0003vZ-62 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:54:23 -0400 In-reply-to: <87wohq6766.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark, Mark H Weaver wrote: > guix-commits@gnu.org writes: > >> nckx pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository guix. >> >> commit 2be6b5e2eea9ac084cc22281f64f7a089e46cdae >> Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice >> Date: Tue Jun 11 20:50:37 2019 +0200 >> >> services: Add SRFI-26 to Nix activation gexp. >>=20=20=20=20=20 >> Fix the following fatal error on =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2= =80=99: >>=20=20=20=20=20 [Huge backtrace snipped, who adds stuff like that.] >> * gnu/services/nix.scm (nix-activation): Import and use=20 >> (srfi srfi-26). > > FWIW, I don't think we should normally have backtraces like this=20 > in our > commit log. Certainly in this case, the error was sufficiently=20 > obvious, > and the backtrace doesn't add much useful information. I included it because (this implies there was more deliberation=20 involved than there was) the bug was reported on IRC, in an=20 ephemeral paste. For the record, I wouldn't have done so if=20 there'd been a regular bug report. > What do you think? Nothing, really. I have so many opinions already, I can't bring=20 myself to have one on this matter. Whatever you say :-) Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXQE8RQAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eTPMAP97IveTQac0njRqs0JP54wGHwx+TtcqI7otuyTRXbWTUgD7BzLGR+v40U3z PpgmLrFxnlTEEbkUvrGAu6cFv3w5WgE= =99Oy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--