From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze)
Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=9CTowards?= Guix for =?utf-8?Q?DevOps?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=9D?=
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:46:44 -0400
Message-ID: <87d0ia0yor.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
References: <871ryvgow6.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ0MsyLmcPSo+O5GydHq6JSj1=JYtA-7KJX77ZtOUqqcDg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38865)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org>)
 id 1hnPfi-0007As-Aj
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:47:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org>)
 id 1hnPff-0008LV-Qd
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:47:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ0MsyLmcPSo+O5GydHq6JSj1=JYtA-7KJX77ZtOUqqcDg@mail.gmail.com>
 (zimoun's message of "Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:55:48 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi Zimoun,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> Dear,
>
> The link to the manual seems broken.
> http://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-deploy.html#Invoking-guix-deploy
> Because the manual online is the one of the version 1.0.1 and not the
> one of master, right?

Yes, that's right. What's unusual is that the link worked when I sent
this off for feedback.

Anyway, should we remove the link? Perhaps the mention of the manual is
enough.

Regards,
Jakob

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=yxJS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--