From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gBcTMhWzrV7IcwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 17:51:17 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id MLFsFh+zrV64CAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 17:51:27 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F652941D85 for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 17:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33968 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUwIQ-000250-K9 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:51:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45468) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUwIJ-00024s-9I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:51:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUwII-0000Jt-M8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:51:18 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:53276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUwII-0000Jk-8N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:51:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [46.237.174.129]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8035C27BBE1 for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 18:51:16 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id fa354811 for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 17:51:14 +0000 (UTC) References: <87y2qck37j.fsf@inria.fr> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Christopher Baines To: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Network services in =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix?= system =?utf-8?Q?docker-image=E2=80=99=3F?= In-reply-to: <87y2qck37j.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 18:51:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87d07mmdio.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.71.252.8; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/02 12:46:26 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.71.252.8 X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -2.11 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-2.11 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49514178744136]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.15), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[mail@cbaines.net,guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[inria.fr:email]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[guix-devel@gnu.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cbaines.net]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: 4F72Q0MMvUS3 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Does it make any sense at all to have things like a DHCP client and nscd > inside a Docker image produced by =E2=80=98guix system docker-image=E2=80= =99? > > I was going to apply the patch below to allow users to get rid of these > services by running =E2=80=98guix system docker-image --network=E2=80=99.= But now, I=E2=80=99m > wondering if there=E2=80=99s a use case to have them at all. > > Thoughts? I'm very unsure, but I don't think they'd be normally useful to include. Making it an option is also fine though. Thanks, Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl6tsw9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xctnw/8DqiacQpNjFzTKzRxQJqXh++qq8uuLC9uKPAxklXZaIqSaXamR4LC00i6 QkmJ3RvLsrPil4ppPO4xLMZ/kupW4BNQF71s9O+MbjHF1z0Xo9xYHaf/yZUUhGoG AX3UCp2HSwLw3gnrjYUAIhnJXncawPDrJLKunx0axGTbMB9+ARNqqCmxTuvCx6b3 JgKKRzphfqSJuIHzMV7w9E0Cp0X/h5yyzxXOp5aRrj++WfT/b2EXyMycr8NegYoL 4HiTXJn+0NWgYWh89SwLWlqfTVrlIH0qbC11VYn/cN92kxsb8hE0TDT6sjPpNxW4 lsQhJaSF8eDMJJxiZXSoKs639qKtw3hIuJsFH7P71WAC42yYAfZMZfYpgV8KNU5P gAgbUjpQ29cISP47h8l69fomsdd8aFGs+Nfrx2gCZtXM94mmOcu3e4nNasGP6xUL Z5jADQQkRFybaRgZ0Yy9OZUCo8b44obEqhheSg/fmuZkQ2dhqZux5NmA78LfpiWF oBKdwbfpF+gqKj12OMQAV5DxjWmoFT48UOwleeWhJQQx3nk5P6BJDQP9B8/F4Sl3 hTVhabF21wLHHLqYwrD0vmuK3PEIoesnRamDrzJFm0VHRjWwnnz/SDW1FRZEE84e wBbriRB8hd/IhAL/iTiumTa0kk7Ybxnx+no9QtdX2vtYnEaoYJw= =y4mv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--