From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id R6aUBrTirl4ecwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 May 2020 15:26:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id uHI3L73irl5+KwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 May 2020 15:26:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21C2C9445DD for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 15:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVGW5-0007rU-Dd for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 11:26:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVGVw-0007r2-KO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 11:26:44 -0400 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:59469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVGVv-00077C-3S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 11:26:44 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 78.199.129.170 Received: from mimimi (moi44-1-78-199-129-170.fbx.proxad.net [78.199.129.170]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 050831BF205; Sun, 3 May 2020 15:26:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Jan Subject: Re: Jami: Bug source investigation In-Reply-To: <20200503165040.34404ff6@kompiuter> References: <20200409012019.3bf4c121@kompiuter> <87blnsiot6.fsf@devup.no> <20200415205419.11e6a273@kompiuter> <87lfmv4zhg.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200417025311.45d50f3b@kompiuter> <87mu6pbghx.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200503160511.6687c9e9@kompiuter> <87imhdyuei.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200503165040.34404ff6@kompiuter> Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 17:26:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87d07lyr86.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.201; envelope-from=mail@ambrevar.xyz; helo=relay8-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/03 11:26:39 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_SBL=1.623, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -0.61 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-0.61 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49377605430681]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.14), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.49)]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[interia.pl]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[mail@ambrevar.xyz,guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[ambrevar.xyz:url,interia.pl:email]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ambrevar.xyz]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.199.129.170:received]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: 0qoDMTneVMEt --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan writes: > Calls over WAN are always tricky, I had little luck with that even with > the official Jami binary packages. With some friends everything works > 100%, with other nothing works. I guess that's because of outdated > proprietary router/modem firmware and hostility towards p2p. > Try disabling firewall on your router (yeah I know, sounds bad). Sadly I can't do that on my friends routers :( As long as this issue persists, this makes Jami not so useful as a communication tool. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl6u4qkACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9g1Af/d8pCbuVCnmG9FURJn4/olBiCKoTh7WEH+U0TKxn7PQ5ljQgbjO+TcLZg b08P/1JbGE3kID8Tto8Bi/invmeuIUEgEsetmbKlKF37cHwkUfXwG+xIAv6QkzKe Lm9tHK+vI7Cx4F52rpJaeEfGQbttUpiTY+Yn4pFiVOlJEYIAkTIT4+fBcDZ8Zr5l yftOJpCe8S3FjDcpm+65YNqXJLzsOBJR62sGqPDbY6s4f7wGHWgbeqpsZ6PUiG0E MwBMSIDmBCPZpSINcFkl40WZOugpDTkIfMaI5VDUTNiLnjArCbLDrLcjqsg+nWeG PGnUTQmAZbpJzmd6gdzV5QUZ3FNgFQ== =OEpu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--