From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +MQxOcfqyl55cgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:44:39 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iDMKNcfqyl6YQQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:44:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61DA940BD0 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53068 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcyQA-0003YI-Ko for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 17:44:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcyPx-0003Y6-KH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 17:44:25 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcyPx-0004Qm-6N; Sun, 24 May 2020 17:44:25 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=55062 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jcyPv-0007g2-I0; Sun, 24 May 2020 17:44:25 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Updating the =?utf-8?B?4oCccHJlLXB1c2jigJ0=?= Git hook References: <87imgn8zsv.fsf@gnu.org> <20200522211710.GA5603@jasmine.lan> <877dx1dc8p.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 Prairial an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 23:44:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877dx1dc8p.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Sun, 24 May 2020 09:27:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87d06txb2i.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: 3fV1Pqkve7ep Hi, Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:44:48PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> Hello Guix! >>>=20 >>> I think we should change our pre-push hook as shown below. >>>=20 >>> Thoughts? >> >> Is it fast? :) > > This depends on how many commits you have previously authenticated. But > even the slow case is pretty fast. I just authenticated 16,290 commits > in less than a minute. Regular contributors won=E2=80=99t have to authen= ticate > nearly as many commits. > > For 0 commits it takes 4 seconds. Hmm for me it=E2=80=99s more like 0 to 1 second, and it=E2=80=99s ~20s to a= uthenticate 14K commits: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/22883#61 Could you try: mv ~/.cache/guix/authentication/channels/guix{,.bak} time make authenticate mv ~/.cache/guix/authentication/channels/guix{.bak,} ? Anyway, for normal usage, it should be faster than the shell script. Also, it performs a different job: the shell script would only check whether a commit is signed at all. Well, give it a try and lemme know! Ludo=E2=80=99.