From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id IH6cOCY1sF+UXAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 19:51:02 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 0Ht/NCY1sF8rTgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 19:51:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB85940538 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 19:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58552 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ke1Zd-0007Yj-L5 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:51:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ke1ZI-0007YO-8r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:50:40 -0500 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21197) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ke1ZG-0004bp-KX; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:50:40 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605383433; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=DS7TyqOuGk8nn8cdyghoRncpGy0L0h5LRaejDpMD+ZF4m6+pQC7iYTxdpMYkDeqYwrY0FCxQeAGGLKpCsAKOnizxREJkDEFOiCK2wS6oQjMyLazUWHRnAjucYdIDccxayGLdMXQTKHCX/hzj9pY11kqll0Q+HbKOxdONs3grNNc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1605383433; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=EGsDWhh5/pCHRls8tCUcEesxdipPh4BZCYxkrLGmQZM=; b=kuO0EG+h06CGw6c5Uzhq5GPuRGyla5se3GZMytebIBsVsLyNHoM/UeAz27yn3gQfpE3IVp3uiST9oJpX72bD6mI77ln0FsmCjaow+RRmYXbawkeZtKn0bjn+FoUSKlEGwly2K0P/i0oTg4JnH9YV6Y4jTxz9iTVu6o7rLjKTN1Q= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1605383433; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=EGsDWhh5/pCHRls8tCUcEesxdipPh4BZCYxkrLGmQZM=; b=iDMDBWh/62vw6ajcHtPz6uqLMSPc4b0M+e6qNQJkFX+lTBu4duWnBqHT4H3Q0uVX DgElxNvG3432NTJLM1g8DSrsracpYfzWyz5lnChi7eixnh1D7kjWGhtnrqWxe/S5lFT D/SEnpYlhEVs0B8I4Ty+bNSI9SmmLhzKl+HWJZJs= Received: from localhost (p54ad4b5d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.75.93]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1605383432601837.424306916036; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 11:50:32 -0800 (PST) References: <87ft5dzj2z.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tuttci4z.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87pn4g8eay.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <867dqoyu34.fsf@tournier.info> <875z68x73f.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <86sg9byj07.fsf@gmail.com> <87h7prx2ut.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <86pn4fye6l.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh3jvjfj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix In-reply-to: <87zh3jvjfj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 20:52:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87d00fd8cj.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/14 14:47:58 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ryan Prior Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=iDMDBWh/; arc=reject (signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.99 X-TUID: 8VkhoXEGn3Bq Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Build a package does not work in Emacs Guix, and this is what I want > to fix, among other things. If that=E2=80=99s the only thing then this is an easy fix: avoid the REPL f= or just this command for now. > I don't want to remove any feature from Emacs Guix. > > For instance, we can keep the feature "switch to a Geiser REPL", while > at the same time not having _all_ actions depend on Geiser. > > To sum up: > > - Everything that needs Geiser (like "switch to REPL"), we keep. > - Everything else can use `guix repl` or direct shell invokations. Right. I think that =E2=80=9Cguix build=E2=80=9D is still a thing that could be do= ne in the REPL (on arbitrary package values that may not exist in any file), but I suppose this could be done with =E2=80=9Cguix repl=E2=80=9D one way or anot= her. --=20 Ricardo