From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uIksCtsyLmCgIAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:26:51 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id wLX3BdsyLmBsYAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:26:51 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A47196FD for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:26:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42136 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCfaD-0007XI-6W for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:26:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCfZ1-0006hw-Kt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:25:35 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:35612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCfYz-000637-OR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:25:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:8ac0:b4c7:f5c8:7caa]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C84627BC48; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:25:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6f410bcc; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:25:29 +0000 (UTC) References: <87tuqekheb.fsf@cbaines.net> <87im6sfkzo.fsf@cbaines.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines To: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: Getting the Guix Build Coordinator agent working on the Hurd In-reply-to: <87im6sfkzo.fsf@cbaines.net> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:25:26 +0000 Message-ID: <87czwxg22h.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.71.252.8; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.46 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 29A47196FD X-Spam-Score: -4.46 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: oum7T6DmzP2p --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christopher Baines writes: > For the guix.cbaines.net build farm, I've now got an additional machine > running two childhurd VM's, and I plan to scale this up to 7 or 8 in the > coming days to see how far it's possible to get building things for the > i586-gnu. This has now happened, I've now got one machine running 8 childhurd VMs, and another machine just running the one childhurd. Builds for packages seem to be happening (see [1] and [2]), although I'm suspicious some of the VMs are getting stuck sometimes, as I can't always SSH in. There's also the GC not working issue, but both things can be worked around by just restarting the VMs. 1: https://data.guix-patches.cbaines.net/repository/2/branch/master/latest-processed-revision/package-derivations?search_query=&system=i586-gnu&minimum_builds=&maximum_builds=&build_status=working&field=builds&after_name=&limit_results=&all_results=on 2: https://data.guix-patches.cbaines.net/repository/2/branch/master/latest-processed-revision/package-derivations?search_query=&system=i586-gnu&minimum_builds=&maximum_builds=&build_status=failing&field=builds&after_name=&limit_results=&all_results=on It would be useful to be able to compare builds for packages across different architectures, to find instances where a package builds, but not on all architectures, as those could be useful to know about (either to try and fix, or change to just support the working architectures in the package definition). --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmAuMoZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XfnZhAAgo2fAM5Ncfib6piiMcDL7HGA6//bMH1J vtFje+3kMfYhe5xhdqhLNzq4iCtKjQ389t1Ww9Pp2wjTcJki5/mubViMz6x6mahJ qK6zaLIgBmjfc4LnROiBo/G7pWereMQ355YXH7AxQAK4M40NF8/z9+kDEpwQlS5J 6VveWko7rhdwp+9od2K6cmnLb4+oqKDLGKuvO4AodRZoPRZxh675Xyuc2GsBsUDp AUZEvs28jJsf9fO+e7KmBbJcoRVe54mHdytcA9tJ78C8SM2RJ74nwCagsRzMAhJq xYCNtE5naM4x6XqA5E4C+cEfmP5K1WHIBpmWrwdOsTvtrd6HnGMih6iSdqR9MO+r v2KV3mkny/5nAybDZh3e7PzM4QOQBpPn3sUHyIgrbxkh6iD0QbS9TboI/KL3vaXj MWP7nb7nGsNSdW/nAd1dGRmCcA/CTdx7r9846cpH0twTPoDWVhO6srDZRmRt93dI gvG60mDvx1PIOvi/sPZRhQeePxOax5i3woy9yIUMS2F8yuyuMksj7ovunttip4QE W3fQzCseACeeoupCwYlAlFv9mjiNhKZihsvIxUaY6hla0u66BO0kckEHlmFnZ3Zk l/o5n3CrFkUhQGdJrLXrfA1KDb3DmW67haZ+pyYghkQAOz9ZRPZHxY5Pa6580xhK eK0CQl1lgBs= =Lny0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--