Andreas Enge writes: > Hello Chris, > > Am Sat, May 01, 2021 at 07:56:05PM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines: >> I think there are some benefits for using the Guix Build Coordinator to >> build things for substitutes, and it would be good to work out how to >> get those benefits to users of Guix generally. > > my question is a bit tangential, but how can we get the substitutes that > the build coordinator puts on bayfront? I still have bayfront.guix.info > in my list of substitute servers, but does it use the same signing key > as before? It would be nice to document what a user should do. In my > opinion, a second build farm would be a useful thing, in case one server > goes down, or needs to be updated, for instance. (And then it allows for > reproducibility checks.) So, bayfront is currently serving substitutes build through the Guix Build Coordinator, the signing key is the same as it was before. It's only been building things at pace since yesterday though, so it'll be a few days at least until it's caught up. I agree that having multiple independent substitute providers would be nice, and getting bayfront working well is a step towards that. > Relatedly, and this may already be documented: How do I know where the > packages are downloaded from? > $ guix package -u > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bayfront.guix.info'... 100.0% > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > imagemagick-6.9.12-4-doc 4.6MiB 1.6MiB/s 00:01 [##### ] 32.5% > Before the print format overhaul, the full URL would be printed. Maybe you can turn on more detailed output? I'm unsure. > Does the guix daemon complain when substitute URLs do not match any > authorised key? I don't think so, it'll just ignore them.