From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id aLs6Lp5gUmN4LgEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:04:30 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id oIV5Lp5gUmMHbQEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:04:30 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64F893871A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:04:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olnx7-0005Wo-1z for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:04:29 -0400 Received: from [::1] (helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olnlR-0003Gq-PP for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 04:52:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olnl9-000345-6V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 04:52:10 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olnl7-0002pb-Iu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 04:52:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=HstIGkNCUEEnqLhuGmm6Ofd1xsc9SgXZJAaZrBKqzcw=; b=AOEFvY5GHAPdAinncqzX hUtO5nDChdsFjcJGf1g8CoH7DZmE2QajbHPRp3Mm3vI2t7W7IBn0fpXma/iMwSGMMRlkSIGUgdfyZ BDvSeoxoUm7tl/mbzXvHpA8380d4BSsgyhOvdjZDzn44rNwekCON0Gn1Rog0Stu63lAWMi6FFBbL1 0cFv7HVeDvrUwKLVZ2g6WtDg9UPmxauEDWlCgxEwJQkSzTRTYpQoqFqZMz7bJaTThw6y4M7pizSkE ksI8z53CPn1guFuYxFTLE84Bgy5bQjWftkpnUuYgo5Ffovo+v6ozHTKtIyJKEtm7WYGJk7UnG/w0h RqK6nr5JSvwsoQ==; Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olnl5-0002bL-8E; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 04:52:04 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Guix-devel Cc: Marius Bakke , Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Rust on aarch64-linux References: <87edvlknv5.fsf@gnu.org> <874jw7oinf.fsf@gnu.org> <878rlaehbn.fsf_-_@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: =?utf-8?Q?D=C3=A9cadi?= 30 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miair?= =?utf-8?Q?e?= an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Tonneau X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:51:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:07:19 +0300") Message-ID: <87czal8spc.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1666343070; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=HstIGkNCUEEnqLhuGmm6Ofd1xsc9SgXZJAaZrBKqzcw=; b=MD1Bxh5IJEvKU/QSDaXFQHPjpsofa/q2sBZ2xgEwNJhw0t0m7RHyIpftEHEy62AAEjNqH9 30VCk7GSJonNNxKrq02XFhKqy1dNOczKfCdr7BY/qWE7rmJ+XdqLyOI02wzap6PQNtTws7 HCJ4+AsbJ6BENYdKeed0C1aSP7S59x+w+jZToUMa9d2iZvU4DjREwCk92NNyTntWq2Nx2z GHFpucnjmtbiZkrCkcyqYKKTwa6+6hpC+2YgfrkN1mYhzrnTxioQAQ2GocIPBuQw2U2/wn +gCxIQ4rJgCchj5As/NWn7+X6+EWB3fNmrUZnVAmWaHGJkweLRQT8td99zFiOw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1666343070; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=natwZ7kSYKAAgkMpBHnxPpTk04UZwpocc+4IXk8nScktTWDjMi/9KFxUpfhtxuUZL7JokD v0Ob6Wr8i9FlhOPHAa0tYI6e1G3AaAU4AqnZjI9fY60AAPg9G3EkR4b87nQDfj/1izluK8 LiU1JZXB4pFekaoFqEJnjVN5wYirOz1GtLz0jbfLyW9kRJD00OoMnX7rmGdPuCYwVFByuE hG0xsshI9tkAGzfzlq6HyAm5OWsanu7ex1x7cBrbRwFTNRo/xACZ58F06oVciLKlX/yadn l2c9qh7Cq1hcvCYv9r8qZ1gl4N1otkoArnHfG/Zqd0PwyMnkle/j/qegkMIISA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=AOEFvY5G; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.64 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=AOEFvY5G; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 64F893871A X-Spam-Score: -7.64 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: pdxVhcvCxVHU Hello, Efraim Flashner skribis: > I'm not sure there is a bug report, I didn't see it either. It looks > like when I bumped rust-bootstrap from 1.39 to 1.54 we lost aarch64 > support. I've bumped mrustc on staging and successfully performed a > qemu-binfmt build of rust-bootstrap for aarch64 on my x86_64 box. I was > then able to use that to build rust-1.55 on actual aarch64 hardware, so > I assume it's good, I just don't have the hardware to build > rust-bootstrap for aarch64 natively. So the presumed fix involves bumping rust-bootstrap from 1.54 to 1.55, is that right? That means we=E2=80=99ll have to rebuild on all architectures. This is happening here: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/739823 Could you monitor it? If things go well, can we aim for a merge by next Thursday? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.