Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:11:55 +0100 > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> Efraim Flashner skribis: >> >> > A for gnome-3, the 3.19 series AFAIK is the beta/development releases for >> > 3.20, so would we want to update to those numbers? >> >> Good point, we probably don’t want those. >> >> Fixed in c499125, which leads to a shorter list: >> >>[snip] > > it might need a bit more work. For example, vte is at 0.40.0 and current > upstream is 0.43.0, but presumably there is a 0.42.x release in there > somewhere. Or at least for gnome-mines and -terminal, I'm sure there's a 3.18 > release between our 3.16.x and upstream 3.19.x. > > I tried a bit at the logic but wasn't able to quickly figure something out. > As a test at-spi2-atk in gtk.scm can be upgraded to 2.18.3. With the patch below, here’s what I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh at-spi2-core gtk+ gnome-mines vte gnome-terminal gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2168:13: gnome-terminal would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1687:13: vte would be upgraded from 0.40.0 to 0.42.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2122:13: gnome-mines would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:573:12: gtk+ would be upgraded from 3.18.2 to 3.18.6 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:437:12: at-spi2-core would be upgraded from 2.18.1 to 2.18.3 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- That looks good now, no?