From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 23:51:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87bn8i7b7r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87twma65vq.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLIeF-0005Pl-5x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:51:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLIeC-0005Ne-0E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:51:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87twma65vq.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Allan Webber's message of "Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:30:29 -0800") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christopher Allan Webber Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > From c0d0fde9785680a3642e2cd54f46c3b447cfbb1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Christopher Allan Webber > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:25:16 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm. > > * gnu/packages/mail.scm (fdm): New variable. [...] > + (license > + ;; Why point to Debian's copy? Well, all the individual files have= a > + ;; copy of this license in their headers, but there's no seprate fi= le > + ;; with that information. Debian already provided us with a nice U= RI > + ;; to point to... > + (non-copyleft > + (string-append > + "http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/" > + "changelogs/main/f/fdm/fdm_1.7+cvs20140912-1_copyright"))))) I would rather use , which is likely more stable, and keep the comment about the lack of a separate license file. Otherwise LGTM, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.