From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Commit 958dd3ce68 will break emacs interface after "guix pull" Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:36:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87bn4j79t7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d1p1fq4s.fsf@gnu.org> <87y47osvl0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayd7T-0007Do-TT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 06:36:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayd7G-0001wM-90 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 06:36:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y47osvl0.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Thu, 05 May 2016 12:27:55 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > Hello Ludo, this is not related to system tests, but in this patchset > you also moved 'memoize' to (guix combinators). In commit 86670ca4b7 I > adjusted emacs interface to use it. Ooops, sorry for the breakage. I guess I don=E2=80=99t master =E2=80=98gre= p=E2=80=99 yet. ;-) > However, it is not enough (see [1]): currently, if a user does "guix > pull", (s)he gets the recent guile code with the new (guix combinators) > module, but the emacs stuff is still old as it comes with the > development snapshot. > > So in this case emacs interface will not work (complaining about unbound > 'memoize' variable). Indeed. > So I think it's the time to update guix-devel package. Is it OK to do > it now? Yes, we could do that, but the problem remains on foreign distros though. What about simply #:re-export (memoize) in (guix utils) for now? > In general, it is not perfect that "guix pull" updates only guile > modules, and not emacs interface. I recall there were similar (but much > smaller) breakages when emacs stuff and guile code (from > "~/.config/guix/latest") were out of sync. Yes, that=E2=80=99s definitely one of the shortcomings we should address: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D22629 Thanks for the report! Ludo=E2=80=99.