From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] 0 of 2: emacs-lua-mode, emacs-ebuild-mode Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:12:50 +0300 Message-ID: <87bn32bfct.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20160613213517.GA25440@khazad-dum> <8737ogma3z.fsf@gmail.com> <20160614122226.GA3999@khazad-dum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDDR1-00053D-B9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:12:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDDQw-0002jg-7a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:12:54 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]:36541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDDQv-0002i3-FS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:12:50 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id q132so19109911lfe.3 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leviafan ([217.107.192.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 188sm2090033lfz.14.2016.06.15.09.12.47 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:12:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160614122226.GA3999@khazad-dum> (ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is's message of "Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:22:26 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 (2016-06-14 15:22 +0300) wrote: > On 2016-06-14(11:46:08+0300), Alex Kost wrote: >> ng0 (2016-06-14 00:35 +0300) wrote: >> >> > The following 2 patches add 2 new major modes. >> > >> > 2 is to be applied after 1 for they directly >> > follow each other in the emacs.scm file >> >> The patches look good to me except I cannot apply them. git gives the >> following error: >> >> error: could not build fake ancestor >> >> Could you remade the patches, please? > > This is weird, I rebased them on the master before I sent them out. > Well, I'll send in the new patches once I have tried and succesfully > applied them in a local second copy. Thanks! I've pushed both patches. -- Alex