From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nethack. Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:30:47 -0800 Message-ID: <87bmvt6r5k.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20160531175630.0bfd76ff@openmailbox.org> <87y46kwt82.fsf@gnu.org> <20160606162541.5254ed6c@openmailbox.org> <20160607172028.GA19231@jasmine> <87fusnj0p4.fsf@gnu.org> <20160608140532.5500b9bc@openmailbox.org> <20160608204436.GA10155@jasmine> <20160608211740.5cb7979b@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cN4lK-0007B2-3j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:30:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cN4lJ-0004KI-9h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:30:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::242]:35386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cN4lJ-0004Jm-3K for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:30:53 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-x242.google.com with SMTP id i5so23129907pgh.2 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:30:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160608211740.5cb7979b@openmailbox.org> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:17:40 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kei, I felt the need to play a game, so I was looking into packaging Nethack. But I then found this email thread and saw that you already tried it! Inspired by the RPG theme, I decided to perform thread necromancy! :-) How did this pan out? It looks like Nethack didn't wind up in the Guix git repo. Was there a blocking issue? The plan to create a ~/.nethack directory sounds like a good idea. Kei Kebreau writes: > I haven't asked NetHack maintainers for advice yet. It seems like that > would be the next logical step, though. Did you ever talk with them about the issues you found? =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlhm0gcACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp0HXxAAy/W3jrzc+mBayNmP25wxAoJPwNqaQb2Fu/KnH18PqP39RLRIHftE6gej OgNV2PQu48KIEObJgS3DKiBLk4qu8UzciXkm/K2OEZrdAoK0foicyAMkkLiltwOi qlXZxTk8qPRRKUZkzKUn5+1QdCfakHoh+EjQSfgg6QHr0k26iH3bxJohMDbkszwZ kAvfkB8Uimue4AxKf9v9AxwdXtK8jQHOr/WLD1SMn0e8IPBja+ReYrLms09w1CSU sX7ikXiskZjUWObDcR9kLcaLkOlGo4+kblvXR2FmqP4v40znzG0GF11IhaAAinKB Yz/v73CzeI/NKszgnmXzO8gxNmDaPyHb9VwX6w4XgKb8SXssGWuebxrQHL6kktot Nicdmpakcgt239cBykL43kvgPKQw6cB3cQ8EotW++i6dtM4uXZyFo2u7yGW5lqVu tCn1GKheJ1UW/VUMZkM4nqN59T2yoc+5un0zCRXfJ5AAeJ0az171V+WgkVcypp5G 1Eev2+E4OOZh4VDtlZwtCge6+wthYVi83u0viIsGyVB/U10pafZ+UYjtv9eIbpNl +PeMh5hqlOC+8qhptHIxGfRrrOmngwJ2ieCTRuPCnj1NsE5Rq1iXMSak+0fZe+hk PLY7uSKjYpHiKrZemOExr9RnOtmAvzwQ7A/XjNMSCyOPG7R1ShU= =LOTn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--