From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?Let=E2=80=99s?= freeze and build =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99!?= Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:54:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmte44oh.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87mvdpw3b3.fsf@gnu.org> <87zihoizr4.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87tw7wspwp.fsf@gnu.org> <87zihfwshj.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170221173201.GA9718@jasmine> <20170221174149.GA5944@jasmine> <87innmzrrt.fsf@gnu.org> <20170306184246.GD2185@jasmine> <87efya44vt.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckxls-00039k-Je for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:54:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckxlp-0002Ao-Hw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:54:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87efya44vt.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marius Bakke writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:19:34AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> Hello Guix! >>>=20 >>> Looks like there=E2=80=99s been a disk space issue a few days ago that= =E2=80=99s now >>> solved, so I=E2=80=99ve restarted an evaluation of the =E2=80=9Ccore=E2= =80=9D subset. >>>=20 >>> Is there any blocker left or should we move forward after that? >> >> Let's also decide what to do about GRUB. I updated it originally because >> something (I forgot what) failed to build without a newer GRUB. > > I think you meant "flex" here. > > According to https://github.com/westes/flex/issues/162 , this commit > should fix the grub issue: > > https://github.com/westes/flex/commit/f5d87f1a26f4a5c3402497008ae10e9a134= 5d327 > > Seeing as wireshark is apparently also affected according to the > upstream bug, I would suggest applying this fix on our flex package. Another option is to keep version 2.6.2 around, which is better than a specialized "flex-for-grub". If the previous version works for both grub and wireshark, I prefer this alternative. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAli9sE4ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpsFwgAt1UrrfSDMxf0aq+CmdL+Xx3vDmoYU5aWCeJlj/GkegwYsKGWcB5WMAaM RrwY2DXhBtW8tsM8B4lu6qjLAhVFbUwtqVAL8gbv+YR0b+oT4Ee28MdXwnxRxoSQ lLP1mqM2V1ApGnIWIRia5Xyz1S1mPz/kUVrJq655N6xUGp91gYE1KsbOSbUOhBxP zu7BzrCkCmoOIuLKwp3xRcj/3lLe0RUrLKs/0HkX3N8LPnNZe5gAmSsWPAAjj1VE D4W1fR5SGzSXgMZTwXufQd3vgpE5f+YD8mOFH7iImaqs3dpNxmJgk4e5HAhAwyx9 7NOVvdYvscd3WQ7cnWeBxMxQVivVIw== =DreV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--