unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 15:34:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bmf0ccdh.fsf@netris.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403170021.jmctpswhcfniblt3@abyayala> (Nils Gillmann's message of "Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:00:21 +0000")

Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is> writes:

>> > Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>> >
>> >> roel@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis:
>> >>
>> >>> +    (license (package-license perl))))
>> >>
>> >> Could you use (license perl-license) instead?  It doesn’t make any
>> >> difference in this case but it’s generally “safer” (see (guix
>> >> licenses)).
>
> Can you tell me why it is safer to say perl-license instead of package-license perl?

I'm not a laywer, but if a future version of 'perl' were released under
a different license, I strongly doubt that this would retroactively
change the licenses of any earlier works.  That's exactly what would
happen in Guix if we write (license (package-license perl)) and then
later change the 'license' field of the 'perl' package.

       Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-03 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180403124356.20162.76789@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <20180403124357.2ECCC204DA@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2018-04-03 13:18   ` 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c Ludovic Courtès
2018-04-03 13:27     ` Roel Janssen
2018-04-03 13:29       ` Roel Janssen
2018-04-03 17:00         ` Nils Gillmann
2018-04-03 19:34           ` Mark H Weaver [this message]
2018-04-03 19:51             ` Nils Gillmann
2018-04-03 20:14               ` Mark H Weaver
2018-04-03 21:20           ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-04-04  8:37             ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bmf0ccdh.fsf@netris.org \
    --to=mhw@netris.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=roel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).