From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Brett Gilio <brettg@posteo.net>
Subject: Re: ABI and emacs-guix
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:37:06 -0500
Message-ID: <87bm0rtkn1.fsf@posteo.net>
References: <87d0l9rdh0.fsf@posteo.net> <871s1pnow9.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44244)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <brettg@posteo.net>) id 1hKRGE-0003Ye-EX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:37:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <brettg@posteo.net>) id 1hKRGB-0001k4-F5
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:37:14 -0400
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:46979)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <brettg@posteo.net>) id 1hKRGA-0001jD-Vf
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:37:11 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130])
	by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21BD416005F
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 19:37:08 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <871s1pnow9.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:

> Hi Brett,
>
> Brett Gilio <brettg@posteo.net> skribis:
>
>> Was there another ABI change to Guix? The last time this happened
>> emacs-guix began behaving improperly and spitting out unresolvable error
>> messages in the *Messages* buffer. This is happening again, and Ludo
>> fixed it by rebuilding it I think?
>
> Can you share those terrible error messages?
>
> As I write this, Emacs-Guix works awesomely fine for me.  :-)
>
>> If this is the case, is there a consistent way to have emacs-guix be
>> rebuilt after these changes?
>
> I haven=E2=80=99t checked how Emacs-Guix spawns its REPL server, but I th=
ink
> that to be safe, it should spawn it via =E2=80=98guix repl=E2=80=99, whic=
h is
> guaranteed to be using the right APIs and all.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

After pulling updates today, the issue is fixed on my end.