From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 19:12:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87bltsommk.fsf@devup.no> References: <20191018205608.45b264dc@kompiuter> <20191101132929.72495778@interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRKMC-0007bx-Nf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:12:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRKMB-0003s8-LQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:12:08 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:56637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRKMB-0003nG-DF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:12:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20191101132929.72495778@interia.pl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Wielkiewicz , guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Jan Wielkiewicz writes: > I have good and bad news. > The good news is I fixed curl by using the most recent Jami source > tarball - 20191031.3.40360d8. > The bad news is that pjproject-jami didn't really build, because the > patches failed to get applied again - the curl problem had occured > *before* the problem with pjproject-jami, so I thought it had been > fixed. > > I don't know what's the problem - the versions of pjproject and gnutls > seem to be correct, I can check other dependencies of pjproject, but > it'll take some time. I'll also ask the devs if I'm using the right > versions now, but something seems to be broken for me, see this fail: > > patching file pjnath/src/pjnath/ice_strans.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 366 (offset -25 lines). > Hunk #2 FAILED at 1655. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 1861. > 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > pjnath/src/pjnath/ice_strans.c.rej File > pjnath/src/pjnath/turn_session.c is read-only; trying to patch anyway > patching file pjnath/src/pjnath/turn_session.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 974 > (offset -1 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 1022 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1050 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #4 succeeded at 1090 (offset -1 lines). > File pjnath/src/pjnath/turn_sock.c is read-only; trying to patch anyway > patching file pjnath/src/pjnath/turn_sock.c > command "patch" "--force" "-p1" "-i" "Savoir-faire Linux > patches/fix_ebusy_turn.patch" failed with status 1 You can safely ignore the 'read only' messages, they are actually just warnings. The problem is that 2/3 hunks in the patch for pjnath/src/pjnath/ice_strans.c failed -- I would guess Jami needs a different version of pjproject, or the patches are applied in the wrong order? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl2/GHMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPquhgf/VxHMpILwVL6KFD42azvmvu6JRHrh4w3flQ/WZg0Vq9T6wZF5tcISWO00 6QC83AjaVXP2q4TwYYwztyNOdOo28l5hqPFNLCFZNDrIgbbMaCvSvDWXPxyWqqAc bJgMCKpMoEWJwL4hfciQsh2ROPvJISyJpYtIkfzI3LrBr/m9teTdKa4k/uTVtDJ0 sbZxOlLATdqOse/24YHE4cER8k08JVHAsLOpua6zjul0CS/qaUEB36fvbqhd8OOf QvTzxXwY+3SJ0pv2jHIMHbsy9Q2YFEtWQTV5+gDwV7CEEMTLPGvFqQ1M9/0MW1Rm dShEXlFul5g98SgJghtx+l1cXjOS0Q== =G5mW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--