From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id mFQrBqi0y14wUQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 12:06:00 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id YA0EAqi0y15TKAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 12:06:00 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 833B79403EE for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 12:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48644 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdBri-0002i8-BP for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:05:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdBqi-0002RO-R6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:04:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::343]:34907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdBqg-0007so-MC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:04:56 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id n5so16439590wmd.0 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 05:04:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TScwY6cws2Y7q2P6lIlNZUizhR9O3DU63wrqtAbSZ9E=; b=UZ94qIBGlzm2xBfj1WrT6o9p4m96kvqbKJb0Gl0txtyg2cCwwqcNsb/pB5cf6r6uTK +iYbVC5l61DfxPQ/LGpgLVU3seBK6Xs74uaLIRlnsvy/W/DjcTDBdBAVOJHzxUItvDSU Up+t24I7oszwZbrQ6K550yzgu8epXpADjHMnvOt8JGY/PkgLzGYFIOYFNtKWNM2F/3cq VHdcLhS+pSD9Y4lP2BXqUfZrhUSmNGJf99MK2ruOjQZEy7ScQNS7E1fb3aOI+tShz6zB qFyIqYfOX2haK9hi8pL7rqECW6x9W+3lI0eouaoYJb5fLf6cNjWrlC2kbxZHde9OFumQ PHfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TScwY6cws2Y7q2P6lIlNZUizhR9O3DU63wrqtAbSZ9E=; b=KC+JilcQSUl4889Vly/QCbfyVRoqygnXqx18T+bzgAT7bl/uJDG/DJ19ybGRWe8lhl Ygcx/7NAkRNZ3Dt+cHofOllhn0MkqwHqpj4p+2i3jN3YrPTDXaNZZ69YoYFpucdXD/XD b0mPRTQnaT0Emz4znCzjZyyCjpJ6De796m5BE02u0bnpN0uX/n2/GEQHoYyd1ace85WP 0LsGT/uQMuxzxu+OFHodaX7xx2juDjBMQL6MVyoOv+rZEF+sXvbCJn3h/d35ZwZ0WGB+ pw8eE7Z7JGqz1CqA15pKOgzgnt198XLohXScjHQVZSjp+AjwnIhryZO5n3oR+LDc7Ue0 xtfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rPScz657k1ELEG7Rg2hMWU8FJu3jbngx5GwT2tpUbzDzxJ+ay Wm4n3IU3FE5bE/fgpOau3rMzuwDq X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzle+hmqmJ7ZXe9DVHVIFFO3wEFTwVsBGTkThG+orboY5xrI9uPblYQWhhLm8Mqu1Qvkz/ddw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:998f:: with SMTP id b137mr18634763wme.166.1590408291150; Mon, 25 May 2020 05:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guixSD (host77-80-dynamic.52-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it. [82.52.80.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x186sm9991026wmg.8.2020.05.25.05.04.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 May 2020 05:04:50 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2?= Balzarotti To: Josh Marshall , zimoun Subject: Re: Should guix track package aliases? In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 14:04:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87blmcmd9b.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::343; envelope-from=anothersms@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x343.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UZ94qIBG; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.71 X-TUID: 2zRQIJDfTlOS Hello everybody, It has been fixed today https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/37207 Repology data is now updated Nicol=C3=B2 Josh Marshall writes: > Hi Zimoun, > > The HTTP headers of the page indicate that the file hasn't changed since > 1970. This is a bug. That incorrect date breaks repology.org trying to > track guix packages. > > On Mon, May 25, 2020, 06:42 zimoun wrote: > >> Dear Josh, >> >> On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 21:26, Josh Marshall >> wrote: >> > >> > Checking http://guix.gnu.org/packages.json again, it seems like the >> > server changes to not misrepresent dates have not been applied yet. >> > Can someone get in and do that? >> >> I am not sure to understand what you mean and what you are asking for. >> >> Well, http://guix.gnu.org/packages.json is generated every X minutes >> (or hour) by [1]. >> >> [1] >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/tree/website/apps= /packages/builder.scm#n128 >> >> HTH, >> simon >>