From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oKdiI5m8dF/MCAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:12:57 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id CC8xH5m8dF9VWwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:12:57 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D11B94042E for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34814 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNfex-0005lC-Sc for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:12:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNfXs-0006ay-7h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:05:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNfXr-0000EM-NA; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:05:35 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=59148 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kNfXr-000140-4Z; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:05:35 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: GNOME: Suggesting =?utf-8?B?4oCYZ3VpeCBnY+KAmQ==?= upon low disk space References: <87y2l8shkt.fsf@inria.fr> <87d02jz4ew.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2l7tge9.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:05:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2l7tge9.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:31:58 +0200") Message-ID: <87blhnyz36.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: a0YdcvZS/o+O Hello! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > It never occurred to me to patch applications to do more useful things > in a Guix context, because we have always been rather conservative in > applying patches. But I think this is a good idea. Yes, it=E2=80=99s an exception to our zero-patch policy, but I think it=E2= =80=99s worth it. > I don=E2=80=99t know the answer. If we submit the patch upstream, though= , we=E2=80=99d > probably have to make it conditional, perhaps depending on the presence > of /gnu/store or something like that. Yeah. It may be a hard sell, even within an #ifdef. Ludo=E2=80=99.