unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Clarifying blog post licensing
@ 2022-01-26  9:24 Ludovic Courtès
  2022-01-26  9:30 ` Manolis Ragkousis
                   ` (10 more replies)
  0 siblings, 11 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2022-01-26  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1868 bytes --]

Hello Guix!

With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
it).

I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
the manual).  Patch below.

What do people think?

If maintainers and everyone agrees, I’d like to publicly email all the
authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing
terms, or whether they’d like a different free license.  The script
below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup
still):

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> ,pp authors
$22 = ("A collective of GNU maintainers"
 "Andreas Enge"
 "Chris Marusich"
 "Chris Marusich and Léo Le Bouter"
 "Christopher Baines"
 "Christopher Lemmer Webber"
 "Danjela Lura"
 "Danny Milosavljevic"
 "David Thompson"
 "Efraim Flashner"
 "Florian Pelz"
 "Guix Hackers"
 "Gábor Boskovits"
 "Jakob L. Kreuze"
 "Jan (janneke) Nieuwenhuizen"
 "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
 "Joshua Branson"
 "Julien Lepiller"
 "Konrad Hinsen"
 "Laura Lazzati"
 "Ludovic (civodul) Courtès"
 "Ludovic Courtès"
 "Ludovic Courtès and Leo Famulari"
 "Magali Lemes"
 "Manolis Ragkousis"
 "Marius (mbakke) Bakke"
 "Marius Bakke"
 "Mathieu Othacehe"
 "Maxim Cournoyer"
 "Pierre Neidhardt"
 "Pjotr Prins"
 "Ricardo (rekado) Wurmus"
 "Ricardo Wurmus"
 "Roel Janssen"
 "Simon Tournier"
 "Tatiana Sholokhova"
 "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice"
 "sirgazil")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

How does that sound?

Thanks,
Ludo’.


[-- Attachment #2: the script --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 623 bytes --]

(use-modules (haunt reader commonmark)
             (haunt reader)
             (haunt post)
             (guix build utils)
             (srfi srfi-1))

(define files
  (find-files "posts" "\\.(md|sxml)$"))

(define authors
  (delete-duplicates
   (append-map (lambda (file)
                 (define reader
                   (if (string-suffix? ".md" file)
                       commonmark-reader
                       sxml-reader))

                 (map string-trim-both
                      (string-split (post-ref (read-post reader file) 'author)
                                    #\,)))
               files)))

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1455 bytes --]

diff --git a/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm b/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm
index de02c6c..0d6b08e 100644
--- a/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm
+++ b/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm
@@ -60,4 +60,19 @@
 		#:label tag
 		#:url (guix-url (tag-url-path tag)))
 	       " ")) ; NOTE: Force space for readability in non-CSS browsers.
-	    (sort tags tag-first?))))))))
+	    (sort tags tag-first?)))
+
+        (div
+         (@ (class "license"))
+         ,(G_ `(p "Unless otherwise stated, blog posts on this site are
+copyrighted by their respective authors and published under the terms of
+the " ,(G_
+                    `(a (@ (href "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"))
+                        "CC-BY-SA 4.0"))
+                  " license and those of the "
+                  ,(G_
+                    `(a (@ (href
+                            "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html"))
+                        "GNU Free Documentation License"))
+                  " (version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no
+Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts)."))))))))
diff --git a/website/static/blog/css/post.css b/website/static/blog/css/post.css
index 57d7f0d..95035ba 100644
--- a/website/static/blog/css/post.css
+++ b/website/static/blog/css/post.css
@@ -38,3 +38,8 @@ article {
 article.limit-width {
     max-width: 720px;
 }
+
+.license {
+    font-size: 0.8em;
+    line-height: 1.4em;
+}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
@ 2022-01-26  9:30 ` Manolis Ragkousis
  2022-01-26  9:33 ` Efraim Flashner
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Manolis Ragkousis @ 2022-01-26  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès, Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

I agree!

On 1/26/22 11:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
> 
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
> 
> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> the manual).  Patch below.
> 
> What do people think?
> 
> If maintainers and everyone agrees, I’d like to publicly email all the
> authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing
> terms, or whether they’d like a different free license.  The script
> below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup
> still):
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,pp authors
> $22 = ("A collective of GNU maintainers"
>   "Andreas Enge"
>   "Chris Marusich"
>   "Chris Marusich and Léo Le Bouter"
>   "Christopher Baines"
>   "Christopher Lemmer Webber"
>   "Danjela Lura"
>   "Danny Milosavljevic"
>   "David Thompson"
>   "Efraim Flashner"
>   "Florian Pelz"
>   "Guix Hackers"
>   "Gábor Boskovits"
>   "Jakob L. Kreuze"
>   "Jan (janneke) Nieuwenhuizen"
>   "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
>   "Joshua Branson"
>   "Julien Lepiller"
>   "Konrad Hinsen"
>   "Laura Lazzati"
>   "Ludovic (civodul) Courtès"
>   "Ludovic Courtès"
>   "Ludovic Courtès and Leo Famulari"
>   "Magali Lemes"
>   "Manolis Ragkousis"
>   "Marius (mbakke) Bakke"
>   "Marius Bakke"
>   "Mathieu Othacehe"
>   "Maxim Cournoyer"
>   "Pierre Neidhardt"
>   "Pjotr Prins"
>   "Ricardo (rekado) Wurmus"
>   "Ricardo Wurmus"
>   "Roel Janssen"
>   "Simon Tournier"
>   "Tatiana Sholokhova"
>   "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice"
>   "sirgazil")
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> How does that sound?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm b/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm
> index de02c6c..0d6b08e 100644
> --- a/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm
> +++ b/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm
> @@ -60,4 +60,19 @@
>   		#:label tag
>   		#:url (guix-url (tag-url-path tag)))
>   	       " ")) ; NOTE: Force space for readability in non-CSS browsers.
> -	    (sort tags tag-first?))))))))
> +	    (sort tags tag-first?)))
> +
> +        (div
> +         (@ (class "license"))
> +         ,(G_ `(p "Unless otherwise stated, blog posts on this site are
> +copyrighted by their respective authors and published under the terms of
> +the " ,(G_
> +                    `(a (@ (href "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"))
> +                        "CC-BY-SA 4.0"))
> +                  " license and those of the "
> +                  ,(G_
> +                    `(a (@ (href
> +                            "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html"))
> +                        "GNU Free Documentation License"))
> +                  " (version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no
> +Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts)."))))))))
> diff --git a/website/static/blog/css/post.css b/website/static/blog/css/post.css
> index 57d7f0d..95035ba 100644
> --- a/website/static/blog/css/post.css
> +++ b/website/static/blog/css/post.css
> @@ -38,3 +38,8 @@ article {
>   article.limit-width {
>       max-width: 720px;
>   }
> +
> +.license {
> +    font-size: 0.8em;
> +    line-height: 1.4em;
> +}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
  2022-01-26  9:30 ` Manolis Ragkousis
@ 2022-01-26  9:33 ` Efraim Flashner
  2022-01-26 10:30 ` Julien Lepiller
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2022-01-26  9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 828 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
> 
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
> 
> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> the manual).  Patch below.
> 
> What do people think?

I agree


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
  2022-01-26  9:30 ` Manolis Ragkousis
  2022-01-26  9:33 ` Efraim Flashner
@ 2022-01-26 10:30 ` Julien Lepiller
  2022-01-26 11:16   ` Oliver Propst
  2022-01-26 12:06 ` Ricardo Wurmus
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 1 reply; 40+ messages in thread
From: Julien Lepiller @ 2022-01-26 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guix-devel, Ludovic Courtès, Guix Devel,
	GNU Guix maintainers

On January 26, 2022 10:24:11 AM GMT+01:00, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>Hello Guix!
>
>With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
>not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
>Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
>it).
>
>I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
>unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
>GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
>the manual).  Patch below.
>
>What do people think?
>
>If maintainers and everyone agrees, I’d like to publicly email all the
>authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing
>terms, or whether they’d like a different free license.  The script
>below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup
>still):
>
>--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>scheme@(guile-user)> ,pp authors
>$22 = ("A collective of GNU maintainers"
> "Andreas Enge"
> "Chris Marusich"
> "Chris Marusich and Léo Le Bouter"
> "Christopher Baines"
> "Christopher Lemmer Webber"
> "Danjela Lura"
> "Danny Milosavljevic"
> "David Thompson"
> "Efraim Flashner"
> "Florian Pelz"
> "Guix Hackers"
> "Gábor Boskovits"
> "Jakob L. Kreuze"
> "Jan (janneke) Nieuwenhuizen"
> "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
> "Joshua Branson"
> "Julien Lepiller"
> "Konrad Hinsen"
> "Laura Lazzati"
> "Ludovic (civodul) Courtès"
> "Ludovic Courtès"
> "Ludovic Courtès and Leo Famulari"
> "Magali Lemes"
> "Manolis Ragkousis"
> "Marius (mbakke) Bakke"
> "Marius Bakke"
> "Mathieu Othacehe"
> "Maxim Cournoyer"
> "Pierre Neidhardt"
> "Pjotr Prins"
> "Ricardo (rekado) Wurmus"
> "Ricardo Wurmus"
> "Roel Janssen"
> "Simon Tournier"
> "Tatiana Sholokhova"
> "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice"
> "sirgazil")
>--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
>How does that sound?
>
>Thanks,
>Ludo’.
>

I agree


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26 10:30 ` Julien Lepiller
@ 2022-01-26 11:16   ` Oliver Propst
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Propst @ 2022-01-26 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Julien Lepiller; +Cc: guix-devel, GNU Guix maintainers

Me too.

-- 
Kinds regards Oliver Propst
https://twitter.com/Opropst


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-26 10:30 ` Julien Lepiller
@ 2022-01-26 12:06 ` Ricardo Wurmus
  2022-01-26 14:24 ` Maxim Cournoyer
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2022-01-26 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel, GNU Guix maintainers


Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
>
> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> the manual).  Patch below.
>
> What do people think?

Sounds good.

> If maintainers and everyone agrees, I’d like to publicly email all the
> authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing
> terms, or whether they’d like a different free license.  The script
> below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup
> still):
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,pp authors
> $22 = ("A collective of GNU maintainers"
[…]
>  "Ricardo (rekado) Wurmus"
>  "Ricardo Wurmus"

I agree.

-- 
Ricardo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-26 12:06 ` Ricardo Wurmus
@ 2022-01-26 14:24 ` Maxim Cournoyer
  2022-02-05 11:20   ` Ludovic Courtès
  2022-01-26 16:42 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 1 reply; 40+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2022-01-26 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

Hello,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hello Guix!
>
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
>
> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> the manual).  Patch below.
>
> What do people think?

Sounds good to me.  I'm curious though; why do we need CC-BY-SA,
additionally to GFDL?

Thanks,

Maxim


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-26 14:24 ` Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2022-01-26 16:42 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
  2022-01-26 17:57 ` Vagrant Cascadian
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice @ 2022-01-26 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 51 bytes --]

> How does that sound?

Excellent.

Thanks!

T G-R

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-26 16:42 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
@ 2022-01-26 17:57 ` Vagrant Cascadian
  2022-01-26 18:55   ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
  2022-02-05 11:22   ` Ludovic Courtès
  2022-01-27  5:57 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 2 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Vagrant Cascadian @ 2022-01-26 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès, Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1095 bytes --]

On 2022-01-26, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
>
> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> the manual).  Patch below.

Just for clarity, do you mean the GFDL with a laundry-list of non-free
anti-features excluded, like the guix manual:

  Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
  under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
  any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
  Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

Without that, I'm not sure you can actually include it in the guix
manual (other than, perhaps, by using CC-BY-SA 4.0, maybe)...

live well,
  vagrant

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26 17:57 ` Vagrant Cascadian
@ 2022-01-26 18:55   ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
  2022-02-05 11:22   ` Ludovic Courtès
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice @ 2022-01-26 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vagrant Cascadian; +Cc: Ludovic Courtès, Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 355 bytes --]

Vagrant Cascadian 写道:
> Just for clarity, do you mean the GFDL with a laundry-list of 
> non-free
> anti-features excluded, like the guix manual:

I think that goes without saying, but clarity is good: thanks for 
bringing it up.

Invariants would be a deal-breaker for several of us I'm sure, 
including myself.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-26 17:57 ` Vagrant Cascadian
@ 2022-01-27  5:57 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
  2022-01-27 16:15 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen @ 2022-01-27  5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

Ludovic Courtès writes:

> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great

Good catch, I agree!

Janneke

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-27  5:57 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
@ 2022-01-27 16:15 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  2022-01-28 23:10   ` Gábor Boskovits
  2022-01-30  4:21 ` jbranso
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
  10 siblings, 1 reply; 40+ messages in thread
From: pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) @ 2022-01-27 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

I agree.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
> 
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
> 
> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> the manual).  Patch below.
> 
> What do people think?
> 
> If maintainers and everyone agrees, I’d like to publicly email all the
> authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing
> terms, or whether they’d like a different free license.  The script
> below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup
> still):


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-27 16:15 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
@ 2022-01-28 23:10   ` Gábor Boskovits
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Gábor Boskovits @ 2022-01-28 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pelzflorian (Florian Pelz); +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1084 bytes --]

I agree.

pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de> ezt írta (időpont:
2022. jan. 27., Cs 18:35):

> I agree.
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Hello Guix!
> >
> > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> > it).
> >
> > I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> > unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> > GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> > the manual).  Patch below.
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
> > If maintainers and everyone agrees, I’d like to publicly email all the
> > authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing
> > terms, or whether they’d like a different free license.  The script
> > below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup
> > still):
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1455 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-27 16:15 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
@ 2022-01-30  4:21 ` jbranso
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: jbranso @ 2022-01-30  4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen, Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

January 27, 2022 12:59 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <janneke@gnu.org> wrote:

> Ludovic Courtès writes:
> 
>> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
>> not great
> 

I agree.

Joshua Branson.


> --
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
> Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26 14:24 ` Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2022-02-05 11:20   ` Ludovic Courtès
  2022-02-06  5:08     ` Maxim Cournoyer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 40+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2022-02-05 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

Hi,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hello Guix!
>>
>> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
>> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
>> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
>> it).
>>
>> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
>> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
>> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
>> the manual).  Patch below.
>>
>> What do people think?
>
> Sounds good to me.  I'm curious though; why do we need CC-BY-SA,
> additionally to GFDL?

We don’t “need” it, but I think it’s nice to have since it’s used by
many free culture projects out there, starting with Wikipedia.

Ludo’.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-01-26 17:57 ` Vagrant Cascadian
  2022-01-26 18:55   ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
@ 2022-02-05 11:22   ` Ludovic Courtès
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2022-02-05 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vagrant Cascadian; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

Hi,

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> skribis:

> Just for clarity, do you mean the GFDL with a laundry-list of non-free
> anti-features excluded, like the guix manual:
>
>   Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
>   under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
>   any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
>   Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

Yes of course; the patch I proposed explicitly states that:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html

Thanks for asking!

Ludo’.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-30  4:21 ` jbranso
@ 2022-02-05 13:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
  2022-02-05 14:04   ` zimoun
                     ` (17 more replies)
  10 siblings, 18 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2022-02-05 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Enge, Chris Marusich, Léo Le Bouter,
	Christopher Baines, Christine Lemmer-Webber, Danjela Lura,
	Danny Milosavljevic, David Thompson, Efraim Flashner,
	Florian Pelz, Gábor Boskovits, Jakob L. Kreuze,
	Jan Nieuwenhuizen, Joshua Branson, Julien Lepiller, Konrad Hinsen,
	Laura Lazzati, Leo Famulari, Magali Lemes, Manolis Ragkousis,
	Marius Bakke, Mathieu Othacehe, Maxim Cournoyer, Pierre Neidhardt,
	Pjotr Prins, Ricardo Wurmus, Roel Janssen, Simon Tournier,
	Tatiana Sholokhova, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Luis Felipe
  Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1151 bytes --]

Hello,

I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
<https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.

With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
the blog?

If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
you do not need to reply again).

If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.

The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
for the initial discussion.

Thanks in advance!

Ludo’.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 853 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
@ 2022-02-05 14:04   ` zimoun
  2022-02-05 14:07   ` Luis Felipe
                     ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: zimoun @ 2022-02-05 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: Jakob L. Kreuze, GNU Guix maintainers, Guix Devel, David Thompson,
	Magali Lemes, Tatiana Sholokhova, Pierre Neidhardt,
	Mathieu Othacehe, Joshua Branson, Pjotr Prins, Maxim Cournoyer,
	Danjela Lura

Hi,

On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 14:47, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?

I agree.

Cheers,
simon


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
  2022-02-05 14:04   ` zimoun
@ 2022-02-05 14:07   ` Luis Felipe
  2022-02-05 14:10   ` Tatiana Sholokhova
                     ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Luis Felipe @ 2022-02-05 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: Andreas Enge, Chris Marusich, Léo Le Bouter,
	Christopher Baines, Christine Lemmer-Webber, Danjela Lura,
	Danny Milosavljevic, David Thompson, Efraim Flashner,
	Florian Pelz, Gábor Boskovits, Jakob L. Kreuze,
	Jan Nieuwenhuizen, Joshua Branson, Julien Lepiller, Konrad Hinsen,
	Laura Lazzati, Leo Famulari, Magali Lemes, Manolis Ragkousis,
	Marius Bakke, Mathieu Othacehe, Maxim Cournoyer, Pierre Neidhardt,
	Pjotr Prins, Ricardo Wurmus, Roel Janssen, Simon Tournier,
	Tatiana Sholokhova, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Guix Devel,
	GNU Guix maintainers


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 663 bytes --]

On Saturday, February 5th, 2022 at 1:47 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> 

> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog.
> 

> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix. We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> 

> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?

☑ I agree.

[-- Attachment #1.2: publickey - luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com - 0x12DE1598.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 1815 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 509 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
  2022-02-05 14:04   ` zimoun
  2022-02-05 14:07   ` Luis Felipe
@ 2022-02-05 14:10   ` Tatiana Sholokhova
  2022-02-05 14:12   ` Mathieu Othacehe
                     ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Tatiana Sholokhova @ 2022-02-05 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1290 bytes --]

Hi! I agree.

On Sat, Feb 5, 2022, 08:47 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
>
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
>
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).
>
> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
>
> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> for the initial discussion.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ludo’.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2073 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-05 14:10   ` Tatiana Sholokhova
@ 2022-02-05 14:12   ` Mathieu Othacehe
  2022-02-05 16:39   ` Pierre Neidhardt
                     ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Othacehe @ 2022-02-05 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: Jakob L. Kreuze, GNU Guix maintainers, Guix Devel, David Thompson,
	Magali Lemes, Tatiana Sholokhova, Pierre Neidhardt,
	Joshua Branson, Pjotr Prins, Maxim Cournoyer, Simon Tournier,
	Danjela Lura


Hey Ludo,

> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?

I agree.

Thanks,

Mathieu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-05 14:12   ` Mathieu Othacehe
@ 2022-02-05 16:39   ` Pierre Neidhardt
  2022-02-05 18:49   ` Leo Famulari
                     ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Pierre Neidhardt @ 2022-02-05 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès, Andreas Enge, Chris Marusich,
	Léo Le Bouter, Christopher Baines, Christine Lemmer-Webber,
	Danjela Lura, Danny Milosavljevic, David Thompson,
	Efraim Flashner, Florian Pelz, Gábor Boskovits,
	Jakob L. Kreuze, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, Joshua Branson,
	Julien Lepiller, Konrad Hinsen, Laura Lazzati, Leo Famulari,
	Magali Lemes, Manolis Ragkousis, Marius Bakke, Mathieu Othacehe,
	Maxim Cournoyer, Pjotr Prins, Ricardo Wurmus, Roel Janssen,
	Simon Tournier, Tatiana Sholokhova, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice,
	Luis Felipe
  Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 27 bytes --]

Hi Ludo,

I agree.

Pierre

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 511 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-05 16:39   ` Pierre Neidhardt
@ 2022-02-05 18:49   ` Leo Famulari
  2022-02-05 22:55   ` Magali Lemes
                     ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2022-02-05 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: Jakob L. Kreuze, GNU Guix maintainers, Guix Devel, David Thompson,
	Magali Lemes, Tatiana Sholokhova, Pierre Neidhardt,
	Mathieu Othacehe, Joshua Branson, Pjotr Prins, Maxim Cournoyer,
	Simon Tournier, Danjela Lura

On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 02:47:04PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
> 
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> 
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
> 
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).

I agree.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-05 18:49   ` Leo Famulari
@ 2022-02-05 22:55   ` Magali Lemes
  2022-02-06  8:35   ` Efraim Flashner
                     ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Magali Lemes @ 2022-02-05 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: Jakob L. Kreuze, GNU Guix maintainers, Guix Devel, David Thompson,
	Tatiana Sholokhova, Pierre Neidhardt, Joshua Branson,
	Mathieu Othacehe, Pjotr Prins, Maxim Cournoyer, Simon Tournier,
	Danjela Lura

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 849 bytes --]

Hi,
Em sáb., 5 de fev. de 2022 às 10:47, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
escreveu:

> Hello,
>
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
>
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
>
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).
>

I agree.

Magali

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1386 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
  2022-02-05 11:20   ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2022-02-06  5:08     ` Maxim Cournoyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2022-02-06  5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

Hi Ludovic,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Hello Guix!
>>>
>>> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
>>> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
>>> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
>>> it).
>>>
>>> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
>>> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
>>> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
>>> the manual).  Patch below.
>>>
>>> What do people think?
>>
>> Sounds good to me.  I'm curious though; why do we need CC-BY-SA,
>> additionally to GFDL?
>
> We don’t “need” it, but I think it’s nice to have since it’s used by
> many free culture projects out there, starting with Wikipedia.

Thanks for the information.

Maxim


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-05 22:55   ` Magali Lemes
@ 2022-02-06  8:35   ` Efraim Flashner
  2022-02-07 18:48   ` Christopher Baines
                     ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2022-02-06  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: Jakob L. Kreuze, GNU Guix maintainers, Guix Devel, David Thompson,
	Magali Lemes, Tatiana Sholokhova, Pierre Neidhardt,
	Mathieu Othacehe, Joshua Branson, Pjotr Prins, Maxim Cournoyer,
	Simon Tournier, Danjela Lura

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1502 bytes --]

On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 02:47:04PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
> 
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> 
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
> 
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).
> 
> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
> 
> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> for the initial discussion.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Ludo’.

I agree

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-06  8:35   ` Efraim Flashner
@ 2022-02-07 18:48   ` Christopher Baines
  2022-02-07 22:46   ` Léo Le Bouter
                     ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Baines @ 2022-02-07 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 624 bytes --]


Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
>
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).

I agree.

Thanks,

Chris

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 987 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-07 18:48   ` Christopher Baines
@ 2022-02-07 22:46   ` Léo Le Bouter
  2022-02-07 23:03   ` Marius Bakke
                     ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Léo Le Bouter @ 2022-02-07 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès, Andreas Enge, Chris Marusich,
	Christopher Baines, Christine Lemmer-Webber, Danjela Lura,
	Danny Milosavljevic, David Thompson, Efraim Flashner,
	Florian Pelz, Gábor Boskovits, Jakob L. Kreuze,
	Jan Nieuwenhuizen, Joshua Branson, Julien Lepiller, Konrad Hinsen,
	Laura Lazzati, Leo Famulari, Magali Lemes, Manolis Ragkousis,
	Marius Bakke, Mathieu Othacehe, Maxim Cournoyer, Pierre Neidhardt,
	Pjotr Prins, Ricardo Wurmus, Roel Janssen, Simon Tournier,
	Tatiana Sholokhova, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Luis Felipe
  Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1471 bytes --]

On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 14:47 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are
> the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
> 
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license,
> which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles
> under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant
> Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> 
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions
> to
> the blog?
> 
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous
> thread,
> you do not need to reply again).
> 
> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
> 
> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in
> the
> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> for the initial discussion.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Ludo’.

I agree to dual-license any of my blog posts under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover
Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-07 22:46   ` Léo Le Bouter
@ 2022-02-07 23:03   ` Marius Bakke
  2022-02-08  5:53   ` Konrad Hinsen
                     ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Marius Bakke @ 2022-02-07 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 613 bytes --]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skriver:

> Hello,
>
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
>
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?

I agree.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-07 23:03   ` Marius Bakke
@ 2022-02-08  5:53   ` Konrad Hinsen
  2022-02-09  2:47   ` zerodaysfordays
                     ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Hinsen @ 2022-02-08  5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?

I agree.

Konrad


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-08  5:53   ` Konrad Hinsen
@ 2022-02-09  2:47   ` zerodaysfordays
  2022-02-10  8:10   ` Chris Marusich
                     ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: zerodaysfordays @ 2022-02-09  2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Court?s
  Cc: GNU Guix maintainers, Guix Devel, David Thompson, Magali Lemes,
	Tatiana Sholokhova, Pierre Neidhardt, Mathieu Othacehe,
	Joshua Branson, Pjotr Prins, Maxim Cournoyer, Simon Tournier,
	Danjela Lura

On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 02:47:04PM +0100, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU?Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
> 
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> 
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
> 
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc?d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).
> 
> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
> 
> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> for the initial discussion.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Ludo?.


I agree.

Thank you!

V/r,
Jakob


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-09  2:47   ` zerodaysfordays
@ 2022-02-10  8:10   ` Chris Marusich
  2022-02-11 14:04   ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
                     ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Chris Marusich @ 2022-02-10  8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: Jakob L. Kreuze, GNU Guix maintainers, Guix Devel, David Thompson,
	Magali Lemes, Tatiana Sholokhova, Pierre Neidhardt,
	Mathieu Othacehe, Joshua Branson, Pjotr Prins, Maxim Cournoyer,
	Simon Tournier, Danjela Lura

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1396 bytes --]

Hi,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hello,
>
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
>
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
>
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).
>
> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
>
> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> for the initial discussion.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ludo’.

I agree with the proposed licensing terms mentioned above.

-- 
Chris

PGP: https://savannah.gnu.org/people/viewgpg.php?user_id=106836

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 861 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-10  8:10   ` Chris Marusich
@ 2022-02-11 14:04   ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
  2022-02-14 17:36   ` Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Christine Lemmer-Webber @ 2022-02-11 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: Jakob L. Kreuze, GNU Guix maintainers, Guix Devel, David Thompson,
	Magali Lemes, Tatiana Sholokhova, Pierre Neidhardt,
	Mathieu Othacehe, Joshua Branson, Pjotr Prins, Maxim Cournoyer,
	Simon Tournier, Danjela Lura

I'm good with it!

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Hello,
>
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
>
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
>
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).
>
> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
>
> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> for the initial discussion.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ludo’.
>
> [[End of PGP Signed Part]]



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-11 14:04   ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
@ 2022-02-14 17:36   ` Ludovic Courtès
  2022-02-14 19:51     ` Andreas Enge
  2022-02-28 20:17     ` Danjela Lura
  2022-04-05 16:00   ` Ludovic Courtès
  2022-04-05 18:14   ` Roel Janssen
  17 siblings, 2 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2022-02-14 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Enge, Danjela Lura, Danny Milosavljevic, David Thompson,
	Laura Lazzati, Roel Janssen
  Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1653 bytes --]

Hello Andreas, Danjela, Danny, David, Laura, and Roel!

I hope this message finds you well.

If I’m not mistaken, you have not yet replied to my message below, also
visible at
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/threads.html>.

Could you take a look?

Replying today is a good way to show your love for free software.  :-)
#ilovefs 💖

Thanks in advance!

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> Hello,
>
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
>
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
>
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).
>
> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
>
> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> for the initial discussion.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ludo’.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 853 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-14 17:36   ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2022-02-14 19:51     ` Andreas Enge
  2022-02-28 20:17     ` Danjela Lura
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2022-02-14 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: GNU Guix maintainers, Danjela Lura, Guix Devel, David Thompson

Hello all,

Am Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 06:36:16PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> I hope this message finds you well.

it does, thanks for the wishes!

> > With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> > we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> > CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> > no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> > Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> > the blog?

I was not even aware that I had written a blog post, these are nice news
from the past! :-)  I am fine with the licenses.

Andreas



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-14 17:36   ` Ludovic Courtès
  2022-02-14 19:51     ` Andreas Enge
@ 2022-02-28 20:17     ` Danjela Lura
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Danjela Lura @ 2022-02-28 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: GNU Guix maintainers, Danjela Lura, Guix Devel, David Thompson

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2204 bytes --]

Hello  Ludo,

Apologies for the late reply, but for some unknown reason this message was
in my spams.
I agree with the proposed licensing terms!

I hope everything is going well with Guix. I will graduate this year, so I
look forward to being more active during the summer as I really enjoyed my
Outreachy 2020 internship with the Guix Data Service.

Thank you!
Danjela

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:20 AM Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello Andreas, Danjela, Danny, David, Laura, and Roel!
>
> I hope this message finds you well.
>
> If I’m not mistaken, you have not yet replied to my message below, also
> visible at
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/threads.html>.
>
> Could you take a look?
>
> Replying today is a good way to show your love for free software.  :-)
> #ilovefs 💖
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ludo’.
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> > author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> > <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
> >
> > With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> > we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> > CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> > no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> >
> > Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> > the blog?
> >
> > If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> > guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> > you do not need to reply again).
> >
> > If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> > questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> > privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
> >
> > The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> > manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> > <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> > for the initial discussion.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Ludo’.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3334 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-02-14 17:36   ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2022-04-05 16:00   ` Ludovic Courtès
  2022-07-04 13:55     ` Please reply: " Ludovic Courtès
  2022-04-05 18:14   ` Roel Janssen
  17 siblings, 1 reply; 40+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2022-04-05 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Danny Milosavljevic, David Thompson, Laura Lazzati, Roel Janssen
  Cc: guix-devel, guix-maintainers

Hello Danny, David, Laura, and Roel!

I hope this message finds you well.

If I’m not mistaken, you have not yet replied to my message below, also
visible at
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/threads.html>.

Could you take a look?

Thanks in advance!

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> Hello,
>
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
>
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
>
> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> you do not need to reply again).
>
> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
>
> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> for the initial discussion.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ludo’.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
                     ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-04-05 16:00   ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2022-04-05 18:14   ` Roel Janssen
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Roel Janssen @ 2022-04-05 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix Devel, GNU Guix maintainers

Hi all,

Sorry for the late reply.  I didn't realize I had any say in this matter.

On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 14:47 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
> 
> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> 
> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> the blog?
> 

I agree.


Kind regards,
Roel Janssen


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Please reply: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-04-05 16:00   ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2022-07-04 13:55     ` Ludovic Courtès
  2022-07-07 13:54       ` [EXT] " Thompson, David
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 40+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2022-07-04 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Danny Milosavljevic, David Thompson, Laura Lazzati
  Cc: guix-devel, guix-maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1751 bytes --]

Hello Danny, David, and Laura!

I hope this message finds you well.

If I’m not mistaken, you’re the last people who have not replied to my
message below, also visible at:
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/threads.html>.

Could you please take a look and reply ASAP?

Your reply might be as simple as “I agree with CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL
1.3+ dual-licensing for my contributions to the Guix blog.”

Thanks in advance!

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

>> Hello,
>>
>> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
>> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
>> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
>>
>> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
>> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
>> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
>> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
>>
>> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
>> the blog?
>>
>> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
>> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
>> you do not need to reply again).
>>
>> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
>> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
>> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
>>
>> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
>> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
>> for the initial discussion.
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Ludo’.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 853 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

* Re: [EXT] Please reply: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org
  2022-07-04 13:55     ` Please reply: " Ludovic Courtès
@ 2022-07-07 13:54       ` Thompson, David
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Thompson, David @ 2022-07-07 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès
  Cc: Danny Milosavljevic, David Thompson, Laura Lazzati, guix-devel,
	guix-maintainers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2098 bytes --]

Hi,

Sorry, I haven't been paying attention to mailing lists lately.

I agree with CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL 1.3+ dual-licensing for my contributions
to the Guix blog.

- Dave

On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 9:56 AM Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello Danny, David, and Laura!
>
> I hope this message finds you well.
>
> If I’m not mistaken, you’re the last people who have not replied to my
> message below, also visible at:
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/threads.html>.
>
> Could you please take a look and reply ASAP?
>
> Your reply might be as simple as “I agree with CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL
> 1.3+ dual-licensing for my contributions to the Guix blog.”
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ludo’.
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am emailing you on behalf of the GNU Guix project because you are the
> >> author or coauthor of one or more articles to the blog at
> >> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog>.
> >>
> >> With a few exceptions, these articles do not have a clear license, which
> >> we would like to fix.  We propose to dual-license all the articles under
> >> CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections,
> >> no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> >>
> >> Do you agree with the proposed licensing terms for your contributions to
> >> the blog?
> >>
> >> If you do, please reply to this message to say so, keeping
> >> guix-devel@gnu.org Cc’d (if you already replied in the previous thread,
> >> you do not need to reply again).
> >>
> >> If you would prefer different licensing terms, or if you have any
> >> questions, feel free to ask them publicly on guix-devel@gnu.org or
> >> privately with guix-maintainers@gnu.org.
> >>
> >> The clarified license will allow us and others to reuse material in the
> >> manual, cookbook, and in other free cultural works.  See
> >> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00389.html>
> >> for the initial discussion.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance!
> >>
> >> Ludo’.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3306 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-07 13:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-26  9:24 Clarifying blog post licensing Ludovic Courtès
2022-01-26  9:30 ` Manolis Ragkousis
2022-01-26  9:33 ` Efraim Flashner
2022-01-26 10:30 ` Julien Lepiller
2022-01-26 11:16   ` Oliver Propst
2022-01-26 12:06 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-01-26 14:24 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-02-05 11:20   ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-06  5:08     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-01-26 16:42 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2022-01-26 17:57 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2022-01-26 18:55   ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2022-02-05 11:22   ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-01-27  5:57 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2022-01-27 16:15 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2022-01-28 23:10   ` Gábor Boskovits
2022-01-30  4:21 ` jbranso
2022-02-05 13:47 ` License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-05 14:04   ` zimoun
2022-02-05 14:07   ` Luis Felipe
2022-02-05 14:10   ` Tatiana Sholokhova
2022-02-05 14:12   ` Mathieu Othacehe
2022-02-05 16:39   ` Pierre Neidhardt
2022-02-05 18:49   ` Leo Famulari
2022-02-05 22:55   ` Magali Lemes
2022-02-06  8:35   ` Efraim Flashner
2022-02-07 18:48   ` Christopher Baines
2022-02-07 22:46   ` Léo Le Bouter
2022-02-07 23:03   ` Marius Bakke
2022-02-08  5:53   ` Konrad Hinsen
2022-02-09  2:47   ` zerodaysfordays
2022-02-10  8:10   ` Chris Marusich
2022-02-11 14:04   ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
2022-02-14 17:36   ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-14 19:51     ` Andreas Enge
2022-02-28 20:17     ` Danjela Lura
2022-04-05 16:00   ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-07-04 13:55     ` Please reply: " Ludovic Courtès
2022-07-07 13:54       ` [EXT] " Thompson, David
2022-04-05 18:14   ` Roel Janssen

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).