From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id kBfuGURs0WVHdgEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 03:32:36 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id kBfuGURs0WVHdgEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 03:32:36 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=bayesians.ca header.s=protonmail2 header.b="nhvM8s/O"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=bayesians.ca ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1708223556; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=S+f0KncR4beDA0ejDIox+9miUGd6jvJ05ec7DYvTFWw=; b=J/e7QkeIQ5/wEJ70jz/Qfge6NAb2VnXEU0Fi7tjW5dENFhaZ2LPIebB1ZpPAnfsmYss4iT kib7VuPAggXq6DX1/hccyUjYqo8EDYY7ZLhljTZmwOdbyKX6W3PK0HuByK4/RSCufmRgfI C7BSSIeoOzIQyk5GWT2Bxt7+2S5wYmjma0xtcxe4Adnf2jkJ6w1me4KjWCgkiuxMd7w7l1 HiVsLMXhxmuG02NUebfS2aCTiOjR/W9em/sE/2tj2H2QUIFNYU3EKMRyom4OjWThB+bfki /IdsQdgIjbkn55qLlImk3ZSt2HV16bA6RqK5/DXQWJksUMhLUuFC+kbRxR0IEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=bayesians.ca header.s=protonmail2 header.b="nhvM8s/O"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=bayesians.ca ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1708223556; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ouzCzTS0iNfmfswAKHsTO7aTfcuROBl93cs5GkTK+QyesT0yWRHHkhg5Z6Ri3cnnVgl4ou mj7/qQZxD/cKYf6UXSVEws6awneB0pIzAP9qDbff4ywnA6lSMYknZUP9fRezd5rrsnydZe vVxCnRcV70O4nm3oO8T04nKXrYXywD1Us8oLmKIG0LSQGGroLPXaVITfowR/HW7ZJKjHNS noYuYydw8Vup7+Gh+DHRjHUqvIDEiqYpyDGaRr1HAr3cyjT97/Dh7yhkSpc9OhgbGcURFq /cgUuRT8wujc6nvGBtmvS74roaNe1rnnERAypg8Gg+ETp8Dhy+X8sn8RfXnSnw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20E8EB6D2 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 03:32:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbWyM-0008IL-6D; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:32:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbWyJ-0008HU-5r for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:32:03 -0500 Received: from mail-4317.proton.ch ([185.70.43.17]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbWyG-00059g-W0 for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:32:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bayesians.ca; s=protonmail2; t=1708223516; x=1708482716; bh=S+f0KncR4beDA0ejDIox+9miUGd6jvJ05ec7DYvTFWw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=nhvM8s/OmaAhhRiFhSGMS+ve2/Duaip9ZbdUe+Jro8HZwkqodvEHUAPIdOEHAOZ8u 8cKHIg9FUXD9BypDk6dCEpfXzhLsx/f5bMXgdnUMP9vslpq3wypi6BdqW/Zb7hOTwR eB1nZbtQN4WrhAu5Nsxg50KoBKp4qBNu3MwUEjHgPt1tn+lXHiNtC7R5n9/U0LSmxr 4tUm5r2a+V490RB7Wm4vynEz80hrgtdhmH1ilJKRbLm7YVe8Wp5PPeKKQ27OKNaVhH AUoYlbW5MWlEdXHMB1r8WgZbLBEBBhmvw+JSSjjuBmx8a7+r8z6u42f/00Mvmnaa5R PkxQ7gHAIZDmQ== Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 02:31:45 +0000 To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Lassieur?= From: Suhail Cc: Suhail , Steve George , Edouard Klein , guix-devel@gnu.org, help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion Message-ID: <87bk8eec4z.fsf@bayesians.ca> Feedback-ID: 38691229:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.17; envelope-from=suhail@bayesians.ca; helo=mail-4317.proton.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.55 X-Spam-Score: -6.55 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 20E8EB6D2 X-TUID: E7JNNXqobiuC Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: >> It seems on the [dev manual] we already have "reviewed-looks-good" >> documented. Thus, I'd like to propose the below *mutually exclusive* >> Debbugs tag set: >> >> - "not-yet-reviewed" :: automatically set for all submissions >> - "reviewed-needs-fix" :: set explicitly by the reviewer >> - "needs-another-review" :: automatically set if there's a revised >> patch, unless "not-yet-reviewed" (in which case no change) >> - "reviewed-looks-good" :: set explicitly by the reviewer > > Would it makes sense to have a "does-not-apply" tag too? > > I believe that would help sorting old those old patches that don't apply > anymore. Agreed. A "does-not-apply" tag would be helpful. This tag would be explicitly applied, either by the QA mechanism or a reviewer. Assuming there aren't any objections to these tags, what are the next steps? If my understanding of Debbugs Usertags is correct it seems we can simply start using them? Though noting the above in the manual would be helpful. However, that still leaves open the issue of how the automated setting of tags is accomplished. Thoughts? --=20 Suhail