* Moving ruby@2 packages to guix-past?
@ 2025-01-19 21:51 Nicolas Graves
2025-01-20 2:03 ` Leo Famulari
2025-01-20 4:21 ` Suhail Singh
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Graves @ 2025-01-19 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel, Christopher Baines
I was trying to get devdocs working properly in a branch, and since it
probably requires updating the whole Ruby world in Guix, I was wondering
about some changes.
One of them is about the EOL ruby packages. The following packages from
Guix have reached their EOL : ruby@2.6, ruby@2.7, ruby@3.0
Since they are packaged but shouldn't be recommended, my solution would
be to move them from guix to the guix-past channel. Is that the right
thing to do ?
--
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Moving ruby@2 packages to guix-past?
2025-01-19 21:51 Moving ruby@2 packages to guix-past? Nicolas Graves
@ 2025-01-20 2:03 ` Leo Famulari
2025-01-20 4:21 ` Suhail Singh
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2025-01-20 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Graves; +Cc: guix-devel, Christopher Baines
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 10:51:52PM +0100, Nicolas Graves wrote:
> Since they are packaged but shouldn't be recommended, my solution would
> be to move them from guix to the guix-past channel. Is that the right
> thing to do ?
Yes, if they are not used in Guix and they are no longer supported
upstream, then they can be moved elsewhere.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Moving ruby@2 packages to guix-past?
2025-01-19 21:51 Moving ruby@2 packages to guix-past? Nicolas Graves
2025-01-20 2:03 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2025-01-20 4:21 ` Suhail Singh
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Suhail Singh @ 2025-01-20 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Graves; +Cc: guix-devel, Christopher Baines
Nicolas Graves <ngraves@ngraves.fr> writes:
> I was trying to get devdocs working properly in a branch, and since it
> probably requires updating the whole Ruby world in Guix, I was wondering
> about some changes.
I was looking into this a few months ago, but ran out of spare time to
continue the investigation. Thank you for working on this.
> One of them is about the EOL ruby packages. The following packages from
> Guix have reached their EOL : ruby@2.6, ruby@2.7, ruby@3.0
>
> Since they are packaged but shouldn't be recommended, my solution would
> be to move them from guix to the guix-past channel. Is that the right
> thing to do ?
I believe so.
--
Suhail
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-20 4:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-19 21:51 Moving ruby@2 packages to guix-past? Nicolas Graves
2025-01-20 2:03 ` Leo Famulari
2025-01-20 4:21 ` Suhail Singh
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).