From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:17:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87a9irpbb0.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20131002124146.GA15506@debian> <20131002180223.GA873@debian>
	<874n8zsc3c.fsf@gnu.org> <20131002205600.GA1680@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39457)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VRUoi-0007LI-HP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:22:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VRUoc-0007cf-CH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:22:48 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:51630)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1VRUoc-0007cX-65
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:22:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20131002205600.GA1680@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 2
	Oct 2013 22:56:00 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:32:23PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:

[...]

>> > Of course, this works only as long as only one gnome program is instal=
led,
>> > since all the different gschemas.compiled step on each other's toe.
>> They=E2=80=99re all called =E2=80=98gschemas.compiled=E2=80=99?
>
> Yes.
>
>> If yes, then that=E2=80=99s another case for =E2=80=9Cprofile hooks=E2=
=80=9D=E2=80=93i.e., snippets to
>> run in the build process that produces the profile.
>
> I thought so, but if possible, it would be nice to have a direct, functio=
nal
> (by which I mean, depending only on the installed packet and not on which=
 other
> packets are also installed) solution.

Do you mean a solution that does not require any action upon
installation?  That would at least require using different file names
than just =E2=80=98gschemas.compiled=E2=80=99, no?

What I had in mind is that upon installation in the user=E2=80=99s profile,=
 the
glib-compile-foobar command would be run for all the schema-providing
packages to appear in the new profile.

WDYT?

Ludo=E2=80=99.