From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mesa-demos. Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 15:58:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8zf7hj9.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> References: <87egos7wfs.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87oanvy8je.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWnVw-0006P1-Cc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:58:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWnVv-0001dz-F8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:58:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87oanvy8je.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 14 Mar 2015 15:10:13 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") skribi= s: > >> From 051341d49fae36579ce318ab0b9c245ed084cdae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: =3D?UTF-8?q?Taylan=3D20Ulrich=3D20Bay=3DC4=3DB1rl=3DC4=3DB1/Kammer= ?=3D >> >> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:57:51 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: msea: Propagate input libxshmfence. >> >> * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Propagate input libxshmfence. > > [...] > >> + ("libxshmfence" ,libxshmfence) > > Please add a margin comment explaining the reason. It's in the "Requires.private" field of the gl.pc pkg-config file. The same seems to be the case for other packages in the propagated-inputs list. Should it be explained for all of them?.. >> From e1f288dee780b374fc2162eb39d96a50d64964c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: =3D?UTF-8?q?Taylan=3D20Ulrich=3D20Bay=3DC4=3DB1rl=3DC4=3DB1/Kammer= ?=3D >> >> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:58:25 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Add mesa-demos. >> >> * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa-demos): New variable. > > [...] > >> + ;; The package contains many source files without a license, some >> + ;; instances of the expat license, and some X11 style licenses by S= GI, so >> + ;; we consider it to be collectively under the X11 license. > > Is there a top-level =E2=80=98LICENSE=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98COPYING=E2=80= =99 or =E2=80=98COPYRIGHT=E2=80=99 file? If > there is, then the intent is most likely that the files without a > license headers are covered by whatever this top-level file says. > > If there is really no indication, that would make the software non-free. Sadly, there is no such file. Debian has it as a "source package", and has a Copyright file assembled for it: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/m/mesa-demos/mesa-dem= os_8.0.1-2_copyright It builds the mesa-utils and mesa-utils-extra packages from this source package. Do we have to do something similar? Taylan