From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Biopython. Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:01:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87a8y52zob.fsf@mango.localdomain> References: <87618xyxmq.fsf@gnu.org> <20150416090030.GA18083@debian> <87sic0z1vl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjVBq-0002Jz-33 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:01:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjVBn-0006ai-ES for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:01:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel >>> Does the provision "without fee" make it non-free? >> >> Good point, you may be right. Biopython is in Debian and derivatives >> AFAICS though, but it could have slipped through the cracks. >> >> Ricardo: could you check with licensing@gnu.org? I received the following reply from licensing@gnu.org: > http://www.biopython.org/DIST/LICENSE Yes, this is a free software license typically used with Python and compatible with the GNU GPL. Please see: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#Python This is good. I'll push the commit if there are no further objections. Thanks, everyone! ~~ Ricardo