From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0. Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:00:39 -0400 Message-ID: <87a8v5ng8o.fsf@netris.org> References: <20150708211909.12880.83730@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87mvz6kzw6.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDJsB-00024w-D5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:00:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDJs7-0007ry-63 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:00:51 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:41479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDJs7-0007qu-2U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:00:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mvz6kzw6.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:12:09 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark H Weaver writes: > Andreas Enge writes: > >> commit 16de69c950c473cc3d386cd7569bd1d6051614b6 >> Author: Andreas Enge >> Date: Wed Jul 8 23:18:40 2015 +0200 >> >> gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0. >> >> * gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost): Update to 1.58.0. > > This fails to build on mips64el, where boost-1.57.0 worked. > > http://hydra.gnu.org/build/563826 > > It appears to be because of the -m32 compiler option, which is Intel > specific. Can you take a look? Boost turns out to be an important package. The fallout from this is 412 newly failed builds on mips64el: http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/105333#tabs-now-fail http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/105355?compare=105351#tabs-now-fail If we can't fix this soon, I think we should revert the boost update. What do you think? Mark