From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu packages: Clean up synopses and descriptions. Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:55:28 +0300 Message-ID: <87a8uwyu4v.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wpy0nygt.fsf@gmail.com> <20150716044011.5698360e@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFlVV-0003zT-W6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:55:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFlVS-0006bA-Qe for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:55:33 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]:33816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFlVS-0006ag-I8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:55:30 -0400 Received: by lagx9 with SMTP id x9so46095791lag.1 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:55:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150716044011.5698360e@openmailbox.org> (Eric Bavier's message of "Thu, 16 Jul 2015 04:40:11 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Eric Bavier (2015-07-16 12:40 +0300) wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:17:22 +0300 > Alex Kost wrote: > >> --- a/gnu/packages/base.scm >> +++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm >> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ >> (sha256 >> (base32 >> "0ssi1wpaf7plaswqqjwigppsg5fyh99vdlb9kzl7c9lng89ndq1i")))) >> (build-system gnu-build-system) >> - (synopsis "Hello, GNU world: An example GNU package") >> + (synopsis "Example GNU package") > > I have not looked over then entire patch, but this one caught my eye. > We need to make sure that any changes you make here will not be > expediently overwritten by an invocation of `make sync-descriptions`. > I believe this has happened in the past already. I changed this synopsis because "guix lint" doesn't like when the first word of a synopsis is the package name. -- Alex