From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: GNOME updater Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:11:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8pl9dqc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87twntsx0y.fsf@gnu.org> <20151208151811.7e16a0f0@debian-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Jvu-0006Sf-Lr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:12:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Jvq-0007o7-Eb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:12:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20151208151811.7e16a0f0@debian-netbook> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:18:11 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Efraim Flashner Cc: Guix-devel Efraim Flashner skribis: > A for gnome-3, the 3.19 series AFAIK is the beta/development releases for > 3.20, so would we want to update to those numbers? Good point, we probably don=E2=80=99t want those. Fixed in c499125, which leads to a shorter list: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -t gnome=20 gnu/packages/mail.scm:211:13: gmime would be upgraded from 2.6.19 to 2.6.20 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:852:13: atkmm would be upgraded from 2.24.1 to 2.24.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1612:13: seahorse would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3= .18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1340:13: libgnomeprintui would be upgraded from 2.8.= 2 to 2.18.6 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3373:13: epiphany would be upgraded from 3.16.3 to 3= .18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:331:13: gnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.16.0 = to 3.18.3 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:4196:13: network-manager-applet would be upgraded fr= om 1.0.6 to 1.0.8 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:837:13: librsvg would be upgraded from 2.40.11 to 2.= 40.12 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3538:13: yelp-tools would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to= 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3691:13: file-roller would be upgraded from 3.10.0 t= o 3.16.4 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1517:13: gnumeric would be upgraded from 1.12.17 to = 1.12.24 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2764:13: clutter-gst would be upgraded from 3.0.6 to= 3.0.14 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1762:13: dconf would be upgraded from 0.22.0 to 0.24= .0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2941:13: grilo-plugins would be upgraded from 0.2.14= to 0.2.16 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3237:13: gvfs would be upgraded from 1.24.1 to 1.26.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2553:13: aisleriot would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to = 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2795:13: libchamplain would be upgraded from 0.12.10= to 0.12.12 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3479:13: yelp-xsl would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3= .18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2074:13: libsecret would be upgraded from 0.18 to 0.= 18.3 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2736:13: clutter-gtk would be upgraded from 1.6.0 to= 1.6.6 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:587:13: adwaita-icon-theme would be upgraded from 3.= 16.2 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1460:13: goffice would be upgraded from 0.10.14 to 0= .10.24 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:398:13: evince would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.18= .2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:300:13: libgnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.6.= 0 to 3.12.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2326:13: geocode-glib would be upgraded from 3.16.0 = to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2993:13: totem would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18= .1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1302:13: libgnomeprint would be upgraded from 2.8.2 = to 2.18.8 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2589:13: devhelp would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.= 18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2890:13: grilo would be upgraded from 0.2.12 to 0.2.= 14 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:774:13: libcroco would be upgraded from 0.6.8 to 0.6= .9 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:155:13: gnome-common would be upgraded from 3.14.0 t= o 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2462:13: gnome-settings-daemon would be upgraded fro= m 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/glib.scm:409:13: libsigc++ would be upgraded from 2.6.1 to 2.6= .2 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > Also, if we don't want to use those releases, we should check if the > other packages also use the odd (version minor-version) numbers as a > symbol for beta/rc releases. This is checked for GNU packages already, and I assume there=E2=80=99s no n= otion of =E2=80=9Cunstable=E2=80=9D releases on repos such as PyPI and CRAN? Thanks for your feedback! Ludo=E2=80=99.