From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: libtool archives introduce unwanted inputs to build
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:48:12 +0100
Message-ID: <87a8lwpyhv.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1457959093-5504-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com>
	<878u1kjya9.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87h9g7n2f6.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160316010932.GB5559@novena-choice-citizen.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33191)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1agfmG-0007Z9-6Z
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:48:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1agfmB-0008DB-7C
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:48:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160316010932.GB5559@novena-choice-citizen.lan> (Jookia's
	message of "Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:32 +1100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jookia <166291@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Jookia <166291@gmail.com> skribis:

> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:14:53PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6) skribis:
>> I don=E2=80=99t think so.  :-)
>>=20
>> From what I understand the problem is that we end up with the two
>> variants of gdk-pixbuf in the dependency graph, and it turns out that
>> it=E2=80=99s not the one we were hoping for that gets picked up.
>>=20
>> The solution to this is to =E2=80=9Cdebug=E2=80=9D the dependency graph =
and arrange
>> things so that the dependency graph of GTK+ includes only one variant of
>> gdk-pixbuf.  (It might be that it=E2=80=99s easier said than done, but w=
e have
>> to try!)

[...]

> That said, I don't know where we'd start looking at the dependency graph =
for all
> packages on Guix that indirectly require GTK and make sure they don't use
> gdk-pixbuf directly.

I would suggest looking at the dependency graph of Thunar since that=E2=80=
=99s
the one =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 mentioned.  For instance:

  guix graph -t references thunar | grep -e '-> .*gdk-pixbuf'

Ludo=E2=80=99.