From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99?= merge is a squashed
	commit
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 17:06:15 +0200
Message-ID: <87a8gso9p4.fsf@igalia.com>
References: <20160802174821.GA29590@jasmine> <874m7297xg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160803040446.GA23535@jasmine> <871t253ith.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160803172417.GA10236@jasmine> <878twd20ui.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160803183911.GC11621@jasmine> <87wpjxy4ta.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<20160803211032.GA6034@jasmine> <87a8gtyntw.fsf@netris.org>
	<20160804082400.GA1638@solar> <87ziosyalv.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59049)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@igalia.com>) id 1bVKE7-0000ZY-Ht
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:06:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@igalia.com>) id 1bVKE1-00053T-J4
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:06:26 -0400
Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:64402
	helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@igalia.com>) id 1bVKE1-00053F-EY
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:06:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87ziosyalv.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 04
	Aug 2016 08:36:28 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu 04 Aug 2016 14:36, Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> Unfortunately, when I tried to push it to 'master', it was rejected
> because of 56 unsigned commits on the 'core-updates' branch.

What's the rationale for requiring non-HEAD commits to be signed when
pushing?  For me a signed HEAD implicitly signs all parent comments, in
my mental trust model anyway :)

Andy