From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: pius: Update to 2.2.2-0.891687c. Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 01:15:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8bd6jj9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <148269199943.2068.14760851879049354797@what> <20161225200230.GA29608@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cN7Ka-0000cc-Oy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 19:15:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cN7KX-0006iE-MA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 19:15:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161225200230.GA29608@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:02:30 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 01:53:19PM -0500, Troy Sankey wrote: >> Attached is a patch to upgrade pius to a version that works with >> gpg-agent 2.1, in my experience. I have tested this version with >> gnupg@2.1.17 as the gpg input and gpg-agent version, and using a new >> style keybox (pubring.kbx) file as the keyring. >>=20 >> This also effectively reverts commit 31fbf4b6: >>=20 >> "gnu: pius: Depend on GnuPG 2.0 rather than 2.1." >>=20 >> Another thread in guix-devel [0] suggests that pius could not deal with >> gpg-agent 2.1 which is why it may have been configured to use gnupg-2.0. >> The attached patch brings support for 2.1, so I think I am also allowed >> to revert 31fbf4b6. >>=20 >> Note, however, the code comment describes a different concern: >>=20 >> > - ("gpg" ,gnupg-2.0))) ;2.1 fails to talk to gpg-= agent 2.0 >>=20 >> I have yet to test gpg/gpgme 2.1 with gpg-agent 2.0, mostly due to the >> fact that gnupg 2.0 and 2.1 keep/expect agent sockets in completely >> different directories. I tried a couple of things and lost my patience. >> I do not understand how gpg 2.1 can talk to gpg-agent 2.0 without weird >> hackery. >>=20 >> This version installs from git because it has been 20 days since my >> request to bump the version [1], and I got impatient. >>=20 >> Troy >>=20 >> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01885.html >> [1] https://github.com/jaymzh/pius/issues/46 > >> From 581ff5477ad7dd0d58550ffcfa68116873a1a1bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Troy Sankey >> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 22:53:07 -0500 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: pius: Update to 2.2.2-0.891687c. >>=20 >> * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (pius): Update to 2.2.2-0.891687c. >> [inputs]: Change GNUPG-2.0 to GNUPG (2.1). > > Thanks, this change LGTM. +1, applied. > I think we should start trying to move away from any dependencies on > GnuPG 2.0, since it will be retired in ~12 months: Agreed. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.