ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Hi!
>
> David Craven <david@craven.ch> skribis:
>
>> These three files should be bootloader agnostic. This doesn't make
>> them that yet, but it is a first step in that direction.
>
> I’d rather consider these patches it as part of a series that actually
> adds support for another bootloader (especially since it changes the
> API).
>
> How does that sound?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

Just wanted to chime in here.  Modifying/refactoring code is sometimes
easier when you do it with a specific goal in mind, so I like Ludo's
suggestion to do this as part of a series that actually adds support for
another bootloader.  Doing it that way will probably make it easier to
see what needs to change and how.

-- 
Chris