From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:12:51 +0100
Message-ID: <87a8ag3y58.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAJ98PDxoj0e-wRBoo++pmn=ds0XOV9Nodv+si_vRxfDei44dYw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36379)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cW9Kj-0002Qr-SZ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:12:58 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cW9Kg-00086y-MP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:12:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJ98PDxoj0e-wRBoo++pmn=ds0XOV9Nodv+si_vRxfDei44dYw@mail.gmail.com>
	(catonano@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:11:59 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Catonano <catonano@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> skribis:

> From 015719506600bcb674b1d47398af27c2b4f32d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: humanitiesNerd <catonano@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:55:12 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: haunt: Update to 0.2.1
>
> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (haunt): Update to 0.2.1.

Applied, thanks.  :-)

>      (propagated-inputs
> -     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)))
> +     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)
> +       ("guile-commonmark" ,guile-commonmark)))

We could (should?) avoid this by augmenting the =E2=80=98wrap-haunt=E2=80=
=99 phase.

Thoughts?

Ludo=E2=80=99.