From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org>
Subject: Re: Introducing =?utf-8?B?4oCYZ3VpeCBwYWNr4oCZ?=
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:20:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87a88grpws.fsf@lassieur.org>
References: <87d1dodcnb.fsf@gnu.org> <87h92suaa2.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42280)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <clement@lassieur.org>) id 1cpyAN-0000U6-MP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:20:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <clement@lassieur.org>) id 1cpyAI-0005Ly-R5
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:20:11 -0400
In-reply-to: <87h92suaa2.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>, guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hello Guix!  Hello 2.2 Guilers!
>
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
>> I’d like to move support for Docker (currently in ‘guix archive’) to
>> this new command because I think it’s more appropriate: ‘guix archive’
>> is supposed to be rather low-level so it would not create a profile, for
>> instance.
>
> As of right now, ‘guix pack’ can create Docker image (‘guix archive’
> can no longer do that):
>
>   guix pack guile-next -S /opt/guile-2.2.0= -f docker
>
> I’d be grateful if someone could check with Docker that I didn’t break
> anything though.  Any takers?  :-)

I just tested it (although I'm probably not the first) and it works
(with "docker load").  Thanks!

> The archive build process is bit-reproducible too, which is pretty cool
> (Docker images created in January, 1970!).
>
> That’s it!
>
> Ludo’.