From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: "guix potluck", a moveable feast Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 09:45:12 -0500 Message-ID: <87a87yswav.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <87d1cxh5f0.fsf@igalia.com> <87o9wfenkk.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3vj84js.fsf@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-reply-to: <87y3vj84js.fsf@pobox.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "guile-devel" To: Andy Wingo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org Andy Wingo writes: > Christopher Webber asks about breakage due to version skew between peer > channels and channels and Guix itself. I think I would like to just > ignore this problem for now: if you add channels and things break > somehow due to an update in Guix or an update in some channel, then the > workaround is to disable channels until developers fix things. It isn't an impossible problem to get around anyway, at least from a channel to channel perspective... since we're building channels around git repositories, *eventually* we could allow a channel to include another channel as a dependency with a specific hash. But we can work on that once we get things working.