From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99?= is back!
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 22:37:35 +0200
Message-ID: <87a82glrlc.fsf@fastmail.com>
References: <878ti3uzaz.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170829084453.GJ1618@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
	<20170830093016.GP1618@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
	<87fuc8lvm5.fsf@fastmail.com>
	<20170830201607.GB2353@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58165)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1dn9k6-0005pZ-3B
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:37:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1dn9k2-0004pl-57
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:37:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170830201607.GB2353@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:10:42PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Since we're on the topic, I would like to switch to GCC 6 or 7 soon...
>> Are we agile enough to use the very latest GCC by default yet? :-)
>
> That would be nice to at least move to GCC 6. My aarch64 board is
> currently idle, I can see how well it works on my machine.

The main issue with GCC 6 is that we need to port the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
patches again.  But we might want to do that even if switching to 7.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlmnIg8ACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPopsgf9HdfddwyBZAXa/dmFT/846USMJ4Gi/xKTnjbNbm3qAYXwjnSBPsdjTnAo
6iCQjuwrgTLD1T8x/wGVeZgoc8hGO6yqKSPAs6UNTJCDjAZPb30bO5YkY+20pYEZ
5PXyYD3EYWnZrzp7MpvtPaGNcIz3vZgIQ0pP4eJeU1A6a7lwWY4W7n97f8SziY+h
zap5k+uEMCqa/Oz5+FrEcqf/49DmzA8pYfRNXKWhnwgX7hUPZyyYt1ZorcQ4Bzp0
vUO7bPkfkMOfPtE7HOTGQNY6sFGNXYdwaanT3yCAiEv2gRVFTspKHlblPyINeb5V
N8xQtFK9ZMvbwTnsPqYUj/+OmW1Uag==
=5spr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--