From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.14.0 released
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:41:09 -0500
Message-ID: <87a7yssv0a.fsf@netris.org>
References: <87r2s6btbc.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39083)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1eNRKm-0007JB-9B
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:41:33 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1eNRKh-0004oE-A5
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:41:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r2s6btbc.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:45:11 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi Ludovic,

Congrats on the release!

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

>   Here are the bootable USB installation images and their signatures[*]:
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guixsd-install-0.14.0.i686-linux.iso.xz
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guixsd-install-0.14.0.i686-linux.iso.x=
z.sig
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guixsd-install-0.14.0.x86_64-linux.iso=
.xz
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guixsd-install-0.14.0.x86_64-linux.iso=
.xz.sig
>
>   Here is the QCOW2 virtual machine (VM) image and its signature:
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guixsd-vm-image-0.14.0.x86_64-linux.xz
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guixsd-vm-image-0.14.0.x86_64-linux.xz=
.sig
>
>   Here are the binary tarballs and their signatures[*]:
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-binary-0.14.0.i686-linux.tar.xz
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-binary-0.14.0.i686-linux.tar.xz.s=
ig
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-binary-0.14.0.x86_64-linux.tar.xz
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-binary-0.14.0.x86_64-linux.tar.xz=
.sig
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-binary-0.14.0.armhf-linux.tar.xz
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-binary-0.14.0.armhf-linux.tar.xz.=
sig
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-binary-0.14.0.aarch64-linux.tar.xz
>     https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-binary-0.14.0.aarch64-linux.tar.x=
z.sig

To enable independent verification of these installer images, it would
be helpful to include the precise commands needed to reproduce these
images, and the git commit to run them on.

What do you think?

    Regards,
      Mark