From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 10:34:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87a7ujgykd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180403154921.54d270f6@alma-ubu> <20180403164841.zufdw64rxcgb6xic@abyayala> <87tvsscdqe.fsf@netris.org> <20180403192352.5zpe5oubs23q3jvd@abyayala> <877epocbvw.fsf@netris.org> <20180403200223.ezezyxrzeeudjrzx@abyayala> <20180403233725.6bd95947@alma-ubu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3ds1-0005kD-IC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 04:34:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3dry-0001AX-Eq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 04:34:17 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:45100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3dry-00019d-8Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 04:34:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180403233725.6bd95947@alma-ubu> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Bj=C3=B6rn?= =?utf-8?Q?_H=C3=B6fling=22's?= message of "Tue, 3 Apr 2018 23:37:25 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_H=C3=B6fling?= Cc: guix-devel , Nils Gillmann Hello, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling skribis: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 20:02:23 +0000 > Nils Gillmann wrote: > >> The patches would apply nowhere then, I'm sending a tarball of the >> work. You can ignore the AGPL3 header, it's my default and for what I >> upstream I relicense. >>=20 >> This is Thunderbird 52.6.0, I fear that version newer than 54.x will >> have the same problem I'm debugging in newer Firefox now with >> mandatory rust. >>=20 >> Headsup: The package is wip'ish and generally very ugly in code. > > Thanks for sharing this. I appreciate that you published this in > WIP-state. I just scrolled through the .scm-definition and be impressed > of the length. Will look into the details later. Maybe one of you can post the current patch to guix-patches and people can then work from there? (There=E2=80=99s already a few WIP patches at https://bugs.gnu.org/guix-patches and I think it=E2=80=99s a fine way to let people know that you=E2=80=99ve started working on something but that more = work is needed.) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.