From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ? Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 04:44:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7lb5rza.fsf@elephly.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWyzt-0000m9-4z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:31:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWyzp-0000XP-Uh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:31:57 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o53.zoho.com ([135.84.80.218]:21831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWyzp-0000Ws-LQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:31:53 -0500 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: zimoun Cc: Guix Devel zimoun writes: > I am not sure to understand what is the rule to attribute a package to > bioinformatics.scm or to bioconductor.scm when it comes from > Bioconductor. bioinformatics.scm was there first. Later I added bioconductor.scm because I didn=E2=80=99t want bioinformatics.scm to eventually be full of R packages. New Bioconductor packages should go to bioconductor.scm. Eventually we may move all remaining R packages from bioinformatics to bioconductor.scm. > Last, there is not alphabetical order of the packages in the files. > How the order is determined ? Whichever package is added first comes first, later packages are usually added to the bottom of the file. The order has no significance. -- Ricardo