From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: guile-email: Update to 0.2.0. Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:25:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7c78x9c.fsf@cbaines.net> References: <20190809091613.32398.97993@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190809091613.E3D4321119@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87d0h484nu.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hz3OZ-0002of-Su for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:25:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hz3OY-00072r-EH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:25:43 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:36132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hz3OY-00072P-8s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:25:42 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Arun Isaac Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Arun Isaac writes: >>> - "0p2v8q2kkz8m6vf2rsjvz3dj1mvnx7dxakjf72dwkndbgk3rp79f")))) >>> + "05pm0rwdxhjdlpmvhn0kyfslph6j5m1gv76givs0hshb30nirl2x")))) >> >> I'm having trouble with this hash. > >> ./pre-inst-env guix build guile-email >> building /gnu/store/zhlm74mr9bv9c4f0bp337031jn52m1m5-guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz.drv... >> >> Starting download of /gnu/store/pr2bqyx5c8ckxrwykiqhxnm1v3rnhplf-guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz >> From https://guile-email.systemreboot.net/releases/guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz... >> downloading from https://guile-email.systemreboot.net/releases/guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz... >> guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz 176KiB 564KiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% >> sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/pr2bqyx5c8ckxrwykiqhxnm1v3rnhplf-guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz: >> expected hash: 05pm0rwdxhjdlpmvhn0kyfslph6j5m1gv76givs0hshb30nirl2x >> actual hash: 0zgvh2329zrclxfb1lh7dnqrq46jj77l0lx7j9y6y3xgbhd2d9l0 > > Sorry, it looks like I messed up while updating the guix guile-email > package. No error was reported when I originally updated guile-email and > pushed this commit. But, on deleting the downloaded tarball using `guix > gc -D /gnu/store/...` and rebuilding, I was able to reproduce the hash > mismatch. I have now pushed a commit to guix master fixing the hash > mismatch. > > There is no problem with the tarball hosted on the guile-email > website. I downloaded it separately and compared it with a local > copy. They matched. So, there isn't any corruption of the tarball. Great, thanks for fixing this. I've just pulled, and I can build guile-email now :D --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl1YRp9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XeTpxAAjkC6Utpar9qRYuY9dBBsQRZg5I2k9NNFT9FdGE8F6WqfKIVen8A1Awt4 XBm80p+ScIkXhv3KrvTYV6LK1S12iBdJDMr7Zz0DpqzKEuj1GOcyDLjvvOuLuPq1 MN+VNySrdtS4OZmePOgigI3S95KJJsNuUZ099D/A5GwyTQw/0Lh+zu3tvDHIhFxr x29qpYhCU7FwjnRj88WyOSMHM6BQvD63nVbG9iDg6ie9JTGRl7LxuwHQMtGhi7my XW1gsWJvzsdLARhlw2VqRtPyNnZvvL467P4NWCjK3MYZel0fd0W+vgMIUxzpnIVt Qtg74uhrEsKzsDK8wBPqoCV1NCmHWvET9EFwGXxGruGaMOEd1YDb0/3MHtcOsjzn 4HTdDZFVMsp3rdMhXfew8oVBgshbT3V4acgeAYVa+auxfze7cImbIVc0Kcdg5RJ1 24jyKn+xjLAcQGCtMF7hBNEgHSSO7ZD1SXDhZLaCWNeUkTcNSYW7l6bbQznZ5WXe Xw1CnQSXY0i/S0wQXofJiSTWSrvXbF/FoRcBM/C/685mBuqPTLB6m0n6WK2apsWu jxqybERpKBRhP0AYQNfBVEDgNCl0HyIj91lh0Slfp0axAgWBhP3zHZjunlgWBqlv V5gMEn4HzXWyjcoIpY2Ng6UzXwFoUmL84tZBDX8V0rGQfZNRRwI= =n1TY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--