Arun Isaac writes: >>> - "0p2v8q2kkz8m6vf2rsjvz3dj1mvnx7dxakjf72dwkndbgk3rp79f")))) >>> + "05pm0rwdxhjdlpmvhn0kyfslph6j5m1gv76givs0hshb30nirl2x")))) >> >> I'm having trouble with this hash. > >> ./pre-inst-env guix build guile-email >> building /gnu/store/zhlm74mr9bv9c4f0bp337031jn52m1m5-guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz.drv... >> >> Starting download of /gnu/store/pr2bqyx5c8ckxrwykiqhxnm1v3rnhplf-guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz >> From https://guile-email.systemreboot.net/releases/guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz... >> downloading from https://guile-email.systemreboot.net/releases/guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz... >> guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz 176KiB 564KiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% >> sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/pr2bqyx5c8ckxrwykiqhxnm1v3rnhplf-guile-email-0.2.0.tar.lz: >> expected hash: 05pm0rwdxhjdlpmvhn0kyfslph6j5m1gv76givs0hshb30nirl2x >> actual hash: 0zgvh2329zrclxfb1lh7dnqrq46jj77l0lx7j9y6y3xgbhd2d9l0 > > Sorry, it looks like I messed up while updating the guix guile-email > package. No error was reported when I originally updated guile-email and > pushed this commit. But, on deleting the downloaded tarball using `guix > gc -D /gnu/store/...` and rebuilding, I was able to reproduce the hash > mismatch. I have now pushed a commit to guix master fixing the hash > mismatch. > > There is no problem with the tarball hosted on the guile-email > website. I downloaded it separately and compared it with a local > copy. They matched. So, there isn't any corruption of the tarball. Great, thanks for fixing this. I've just pulled, and I can build guile-email now :D