From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: Error cross-compiling Mesa: failing test Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:34:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87a7apabip.fsf@devup.no> References: <87ftl9z1e8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a7bggnla.fsf@devup.no> <87blvgbm5d.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87y2ykd04z.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <878sqkblh7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9toczrt.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <87zhj0a5d9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h84xg61n.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDu8k-0000u0-DF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:34:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDu8i-0003YB-E4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:34:46 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:59795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDu8h-0003XW-PV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:34:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h84xg61n.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt , Jelle Licht , guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Marius: you told me to update master, but > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> guix refresh -l mesa > Building the following 822 packages would ensure 1514 dependent packages are rebuilt: > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > I'd say this should go to staging. Thoughts? This change only affects i686 cross-builds of Mesa, because the conditional is tested outside of the builder. I.e. "guix build mesa" should produce the same result before and after this change, even on i686. If that is the case, it is safe for 'master'. I'm still not sure whether it is sensible for meson-build-system to run tests when cross-compiling, but that is another story. :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl2OSC4ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqZwgf/cm2XV0or9FVrE44XaQ0myNMLSyU46RtGMMBLn8JAwQtzDa3L794Q1She l5fDEfI2vRarQQ/y1ZPjSKRVpsx/sTG62ShIVmiznhKjMXq83kEKIjCWHGT8bEtd vukHChxk78D7tzOdG3M4ESqPjoPd53HXcM+x8HPFcwpqjLD3H1ipY9gO2Wi8YED6 8nbSdoZUrik8CURT9ktQJnUVitfrpaNFhTasAWTD31YcIGhOYur4qBZeBbmn1fRJ nP1V9jC3BpBripA57Mv9lPXOmSgARQxJi6WUE6Tryf1+FDssF9vqy7LH/hzsN/+y erlWePDWzj5SGxKqlQzPVChqO9CIcg== =edg5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--