From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id EMLiGI+s0l/idgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 23:17:35 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id GDW3FI+s0l9IDgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 23:17:35 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA28B940367 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 23:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41900 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knVBl-0006W5-J5 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:17:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knV7u-0003lx-Vx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:13:38 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]:42869) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knV7s-00044C-W0; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:13:34 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id bd6so3342415qvb.9; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:13:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jGOCieVfuNjsV1plBPuwv5S8OyUyH9ChLkuJ68zW2NI=; b=kUCdpPf7psW7XjZVHKj7U3qI5OD5VzwD+KrKOt8nErUW7o5KVnCMeW5A1Vh6uVzOG7 DixhNEMJ60rvpSPNi+IzZrGDvPNj6UJOwLZFLKeED6Hymt9mjt2zglwQRcUQZfUfGkuU oB/FzBWcBFIOc/EosGAlFzdD7Vz48p0DZ9fVrRZujmiKv7EYu7R+y7LR3R59/rOyikuw hwLMFWTd8C03AGBk4ike2tQScKcjrnQjC1/b4v0F6njjKnFk6AB9nvk8DSzP3N/H53PE JWiRen7shoVrGI36aDafxhLv93k/1i0mXmIlCItCKKKiLwc9KPMq9YE8LlR7niro1igy IfUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jGOCieVfuNjsV1plBPuwv5S8OyUyH9ChLkuJ68zW2NI=; b=lxrreqNvIJCr19zkL/d3vbwE5qUTDVMi7ojKB7pm5jUR8/r1bfiwtA4Y9YofoVKrBl MwVQJPb/3eKBWdMwiC0zsouhQz++iBCWokG6u/EFpnZO/VwQUnVvcVWHJK2UJj2ZPrFu 8DwKXNvpm7NttEjzhs1CIePuv1UpRVWODDyHtlQejHRJ3ObXcdlR+34ZYqoA9437jMCT jmHAVpcO4iNHL121/6th2vBOEg4B2ms0VbBlvGb7JE1k+QOrI+Zq9BdGjSvhR8rTC/PB /BLblAF+TnhUULaQt6Urxc8R7ClKntkMwSpKlT+7w/cgz8nnjRjhbm/xA3cdve1Y+u7G R1IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mBgKgA3iVi04cuSoz9wItV30BQy0NV8PgNENStwCr+FE8I4Wa IL4hVer3Z9yvLrvvuKxam7D51jOqvOd5zQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdsO2OEe1w29Xk8lbybGwKVw+ub3QmZsfdVhORcvFYuUrok60DYwuc9+KH51qPCOsW4BC2Yw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:ac44:: with SMTP id m4mr12002181qvb.45.1607642011460; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:13:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-150-179.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.150.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r8sm5120539qtj.94.2020.12.10.15.13.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:13:30 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: New =?utf-8?B?4oCcdW5ncmFmdGluZ+KAnQ==?= branch References: <87v9dcv8mt.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:13:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v9dcv8mt.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2020 12:29:14 +0100") Message-ID: <87a6ul5k6e.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf31.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.00 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kUCdpPf7; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AA28B940367 X-Spam-Score: -3.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: e9QtWFfZhS3v Hello Ludo, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi Guix! > > Following discussions on IRC, I=E2=80=99ve created a new =E2=80=98ungraft= ing=E2=80=99 branch > that does nothing but ungraft things. > > The rationale is that grafts incur additional overhead when installing > things (the time to create those grafts), so it=E2=80=99s good to clean t= hem up > once in a while. Ungrafting in a dedicated branch means we know the > branch is =E2=80=9Csafe=E2=80=9D, unlike more exploratory branches like = =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99 and > =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. > > The plan is to start building it later today, and to hopefully be done > in a week or so. > > Thoughts? To me, staging is not enough exploratory the point to warrant an additional ungrafting branch (my preference would be to rather see staging merged sooner), but then I haven't kept a close look of what's gone to it recently. Having more branches also translates to more load on the CI, unless I'm missing something. Thank you for the initiative, Maxim